I am using LaTeX with the article document class. The Bibtex bibliography style that I am using is agsm, part of the Harvard family of bibliography styles.
My article entry is
@Article{Bozzola2018,
author = {Bozzola, Martina and Massetti, Emanuele and Mendelsohn, Robert and Capitanio, Fabian},
title = {A Ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change on Italian agriculture},
journal = {European Review of Agricultural Economics},
year = {2018},
volume = {45},
number = {1},
pages = {57-79},
issn = {0165-1587},
doi = {10.1093/erae/jbx023},
type = {Journal Article},
}
If I cite Bozzola et al. (2018), then under agsm style, it would be as below in the reference list.
Bozzola, M., Massetti, E., Mendelsohn, R. and Capitanio, F. (2018),
‘A ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change on Italian agriculture’,
European Review of Agricultural Economics 45(1), 57–79
Which part of the agsm.bst can I modify to obtain the outcome as
Bozzola, M., E. Massetti, R. Mendelsohn, and F. Capitanio (2018),
‘A ricardian analysis of the impact of climate change on Italian agriculture’,
European Review of Agricultural Economics 45(1), 57–79 ?
agsm, it would be much more efficient if you familiarized yourself with themakebstutility, which is part of the custom-bib package. Themakebstutility lets users create highly customized bibliography style files from scratch. (In case you doubt my claim thatagsmis quirky, do please check out the posting AGSM bibliography style sometimes doesn't abbreviate to “et al.” for duplicate author+year.) – Mico Jun 14 '18 at 16:02agsm) from theharvardfamily of styles. This is simply not the case. Happily, themakebstutility lets users create a bst file that satisfies each and every formatting requirement of the "Harvard-ISS" style -- and much more rapidly and robustly so than if users take the route of adapting (hacking!) an existing but quirky style such asagsm. Observing that the "agsm style [is] to some exten[t] similar to my uni's requirement" isn't saying much, really. – Mico Jun 14 '18 at 16:33biblatexandbiber. Probably you can fix all style requirement easily via biblatex package options without making a .bst file, and maybe only using a predefined Harvard style for biblatex. I not testead any of these but seem that biblatex-bath package or ecobiblatex could be what you are looking for. Without biblatex, maybe bath-bst can help. – Fran Jun 14 '18 at 19:01agsmbibliography style. – Mico Jun 14 '18 at 20:17