Is there a symbol for "non-transversality" (or how to create it)? I am thinking about something similar to the negation of the symbol \pitchfork. I did not find anything like this in the list of available symbols.
- 17,663
- 5
- 55
- 63
- 193
3 Answers
If you're interested in extracting only the symbol you're after from MnSymbol, then you can follow the procedure listed in Interior product (contraction) symbol.
Here is an MWE that defines \nontrans as a binary relation:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}% http://ctan.org/pkg/amsmath
\usepackage{fonttable}% http://ctan.org/pkg/fonttable
\DeclareFontFamily{U}{MnSymbolB}{}
\DeclareSymbolFont{MnSyB}{U}{MnSymbolB}{m}{n}
\DeclareFontShape{U}{MnSymbolB}{m}{n}{
<-6> MnSymbolB5
<6-7> MnSymbolB6
<7-8> MnSymbolB7
<8-9> MnSymbolB8
<9-10> MnSymbolB9
<10-12> MnSymbolB10
<12-> MnSymbolB12}{}
\DeclareMathSymbol{\nontrans}{\mathbin}{MnSyB}{'211}% Symbol 211
\begin{document}
$A\nontrans B$
\end{document}
In fact, \nontrans is symbol '211 (octal, or decimal 137) from MnSymbolB. Here's the font table if you're interested in extracting a different symbol:

The above font table was created via the fonttable package and adding
\xfonttable{U}{MnSymbolB}{m}{n}% MnSymbolB font table
to the above MWE.
-
Well done! I would just add that for consistency it is probably good to use the symbol for
\pitchforkfromMnSymbolas well (it is inMnSymbolAfont I believe). – yo' Feb 09 '12 at 07:04
The MnSymbol Pitchforks provides \nuppitchfork found in The Comprehensive LATEX Symbol List by Scott Pakin on page 47.

EDIT:
To create a similar effect, try the following though to my knowledge it is not the most appropriate Latex way of negating a Math Symbol:
\documentclass[letterpaper]{article}
\usepackage{mathabx}
\begin{document}
\makebox[1em]{$\pitchfork$}\hspace{-1em}\makebox[1em]{/}
\end{document}
Which produces:

- 28,884
-
2beware the side effects of
mathabx; it changes the shape of many symbols. if just one or two symbols are needed, there is a "recipe" for accomplishing that in an answer to this question. – barbara beeton Feb 07 '12 at 17:57 -
I suppose so, my suggestion is just a sample with a
\pitchforkwithout negation. – azetina Feb 07 '12 at 18:05 -
but a
\pitchforkdoes require a package that provides the symbol. the package shown in your example ismathabx. (this symbol is also provided by\usepackage{amssymb}, which conflicts with none of the "standard" computer modern symbols. there may be others that don't have such a wide-reaching scope, but i haven't checked.) – barbara beeton Feb 07 '12 at 19:04 -
MnSymbolis a package that provides really a lot of symbols, but changes the appearance of a lot of symbols. I would really need some option passed to that package, so that I can write e.g.\Mn{\pitchfork}to get the one fromMnSymbolpackage and without\Mnto get the symbols as usual. – yo' Feb 08 '12 at 09:01
I guess that the following code gives pretty good results, that are consinstent while scaling. (We made an \overline over something that has a width of the symbol and height of a single ..)
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\def\npitchfork{\mathrel{\overline{\vphantom{.}\smash{\pitchfork}}}}
\begin{document}
\[
A \npitchfork B_{{X\npitchfork Y}_{M\npitchfork N}}
\]
\end{document}
- 51,322
\not\pitchfork? BTW, Welcome to TeX.SE. – Peter Grill Feb 07 '12 at 16:03