There seems to be barely any spacing (if at all) after \Sigma, making it hard to read. Is this normal? Is there any way around it?
$ \Sigma_{v \in V} \alpha $
Output:
Desired output:
There seems to be barely any spacing (if at all) after \Sigma, making it hard to read. Is this normal? Is there any way around it?
$ \Sigma_{v \in V} \alpha $
Output:
Desired output:
You should use \sum, not \Sigma, to create a summation symbol. The \sum symbol is slightly larger than \Sigma when used in text style, and a whole lot larger when used in display style. In addition, the math type of \sum is math-op ("math operator"), whereas the math type of \Sigma is math-ord ("ordinary atom"); this strongly affects the amount of whitespace TeX inserts before and after the symbol.
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
$\Sigma_{i\in V} \beta_i \quad
\sum_{i\in V} \beta_i \quad
\sum\limits_{i\in V}\beta_i \quad
{\displaystyle\sum\nolimits_{i\in V} \beta_i} \quad
\displaystyle\sum_{i\in V} \beta_i$
\end{document}
\sum? – Ulrike Fischer Dec 09 '18 at 17:15\Sigmais a normal greek letter so has no spacing just asabchas no extra spacing, if you mean summation operator then use\sumwhich is a different character and also specified as a math operator so has different spacing. – David Carlisle Dec 09 '18 at 17:25