2

The following code

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}

\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]{geometry}


\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} 
\theoremstyle{remark}


\begin{document}
\title{Extra Credit}
\maketitle

\begin{definition}
If f is analytic at $z_0$, then the series

$$f(z_0) + f'(z_0)(z-z_0) + \frac{f''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2 + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(z_0)}{n!}(z-z_0)^n \hspace{1cm}(1)$$ 

is called the Taylor series for f around $z_0$.
\end{definition}

\begin{theorem}
If f is analytic inside and on the simple closed positively oriented contour $\Gamma$ and if $z_0$ is any point inside $\Gamma$, then
$$f^{(n)}(z_0) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int_{\Gamma} \frac{f(\zeta)}{(\zeta - z_0)^{n+1}}d\zeta \hspace{1cm} (n=1,2,3, \cdots )$$ \hfill (2)
\end{theorem}\hrulefill

produces enter image description here

How can I align the (1) and (2), and also get (2) to be on the same line as (n=1,2,3,...)?

Skm
  • 293
  • 1
  • 7
  • Show your full work not just sniplet, we need a full but minimal example. Also you should not ude $$... $$ syntax in a latex document. It does not follow latex configurations. – daleif Mar 30 '19 at 17:58
  • @daleif: What do I use instead? Also, I edited and added the preamble. – Skm Mar 30 '19 at 18:04
  • 2
    Never even noticed you're setting the equation numbers by hand. You really should read a proper introduction to latex. You're already using amsmath, it provides many useful math constructions. Plus latex it self provides the equation environment which does exactly what you want here, automatically! – daleif Mar 30 '19 at 18:07
  • Off topic ... Unless this is just the residue of stripping down a longer file to get a MWE, there's nothing gained by specifying \theoremstyle after all your \newtheorem definitions. Also, it's more traditional for definitions to have their text in upright type; for that \theoremstyle{definition} would be the appropriate command. – barbara beeton Mar 30 '19 at 20:08

3 Answers3

5

Use another approach, with the equation environment:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}

\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]{geometry}


\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} 
\theoremstyle{remark}

\begin{document}
    \title{Extra Credit}
    \maketitle

    \begin{definition}
        If f is analytic at $z_0$, then the series

        \begin{equation}
            f(z_0) + f'(z_0)(z-z_0) + \frac{f''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2 + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(z_0)}{n!}(z-z_0)^n
        \end{equation}

        is called the Taylor series for f around $z_0$.
    \end{definition}

    \begin{theorem}
        If f is analytic inside and on the simple closed positively oriented contour $\Gamma$ and if $z_0$ is any point inside $\Gamma$, then
        \begin{equation}
            f^{(n)}(z_0) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int_{\Gamma} \frac{f(\zeta)}{(\zeta - z_0)^{n+1}}d\zeta \hspace{1cm} (n=1,2,3, \cdots )
        \end{equation}
    \end{theorem}
    \hrulefill
\end{document}

  • 3
    Never leave a blank line before \begin{equation}. One after \end{equation} can go, in case the equation ends the paragraph, which is not the case here. – egreg Mar 31 '19 at 19:22
5

One of the key features of (La)TeX is its ability to automatically number sections, theorems, list items and so on for you. This includes equations! Using

\begin{equation}
\label{somename}
    e=mc^2
\end{equation}

creates an equation with the next number in sequence, and you can refer back to it with \eqref{somename}. Just as with other automatically numbered thing, you can insert a new numbered equation before this one and all the numbers will be correctly updated. You can create unnumbered equations with the equation* environment (or, with less typing, \[ ... \]). Other equation-like environments also have a * version that doesn't number.

Note that it is not recommended to use $$...$$ for equations in LaTeX.

(Also, I'd strongly recommend numbering all Definitions, Theorems, etc. in the same series. It's really annoying to be looking for Theorem 4 in a long document when seeing Lemma 3 and Definition 5 give you no hint about whether you should look backwards or forwards.)

4

I highly suggest to use a different approach:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[english]{babel}

\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage[left=1.5in, right=1.5in, top=0.5in]{geometry}% I do not recommend to use this naiv canons of page construction for typographic reasons.  
\usepackage[noabbrev]{cleveref}%new package

\newtheorem{definition}{Definition}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem} 
\theoremstyle{remark}

\begin{document}
\title{Extra Credit}
\maketitle

\begin{definition}
If f is analytic at $z_0$, then the series
\begin{align}%observe that empty line is removed
    f(z_0) + f'(z_0)(z-z_0) + \frac{f''(z_0)}{2!}(z-z_0)^2 + \cdots = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{f^{(n)}(z_0)}{n!}(z-z_0)^n \label{eq:Taylor} 
\end{align}%observe that empty line is removed
is called the \emph{Taylor series} for f around $z_0$.%The definition is not in italics here to emphasize the term. 
\end{definition}

\begin{theorem}
If f is analytic inside and on the simple closed positively oriented contour $\Gamma$ and if $z_0$ is any point inside $\Gamma$, then
\begin{align}
    f^{(n)}(z_0) = \frac{n!}{2\pi i} \int_{\Gamma} \frac{f(\zeta)}{(\zeta - z_0)^{n+1}}d\zeta \hspace{1cm} (n=1,2,3, \cdots ).%every parenthesis should be ended with a dot. 
\end{align}
\end{theorem}

\noindent\hrulefill %alternative:  \hrule

You can use refer to the equation by: \eqref{eq:Taylor} or \cref{eq:Taylor}. %This is the usual approach to refer to formulas. 

\end{document}

enter image description here

Please read the comments in the code and What are the differences between $$, \[, align, equation and displaymath?. Other useful staff is written in https://ctan.org/pkg/short-math-guide, https://ctan.org/pkg/lshort-english, and What are good learning resources for a LaTeX beginner?.

CampanIgnis
  • 4,624
  • Can the downvoter please explain what is bad about this solution? – CampanIgnis Mar 30 '19 at 18:16
  • +1 for the answer, however you should mentioned in it that op approach to numbering of equations should be as you used in your answers. – Zarko Mar 30 '19 at 18:20
  • 4
    Why are you using align for one-line equations? It's not meant for that; it's meant for multi-line equations. Better to use equation. – barbara beeton Mar 30 '19 at 20:01
  • @barbarabeeton That is a fair point. Because I am sometimes lazy and in many (simple) examples align gives a similar result. – CampanIgnis Mar 30 '19 at 20:57