While checking my references I noticed that the urldate is printed in the wrong format. My document is being typeset in British English, where it is common to write the date as Day/Month/Year, compared to the American format Month/Day/Year. The output of my references, however, is in the American format.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{parskip}
\usepackage{polyglossia}
\setmainlanguage[variant = british]{english}
\usepackage[backend = biber, citestyle = numeric-comp, language = british]{biblatex}
\begin{filecontents}{references.bib}
@misc{Test,
author = {NanoTemper},
title = {{This is a test title}},
year = {2019},
url = {https://example.com},
urldate = {2019-05-21}
}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{references.bib}
\begin{document}
Foo bar\cite{Test}.
\printbibliography
\end{document}
What should I use to get the British date format?

babelinstead ofpolyglossiaan option? https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/464281/35864, https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/324849/35864, https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/432347/35864 (Cf. also https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/482396/35864) – moewe May 22 '19 at 17:00XeLaTeXit could be complicated. Wasn'tpolyglossiadeveloped as a potential replacement forbabelwhen usingXeLaTeX? – Sam May 22 '19 at 17:03biblatexwill warn aboutpolyglossiato avoid these things slipping past. https://github.com/plk/biblatex/issues/845 – moewe May 22 '19 at 17:03polyglossiadevelopment has effectively stalled in recent years. For languages with Latin scriptpolyglossiaoffers very little to no advantage at all (it might even be worse for some languages, apparently French would be such a case). If you have non-Latin (especially RTL) scripts, things might be different. – moewe May 22 '19 at 17:05babelworks fine in my case. And well, the date is in the correct output. – Sam May 22 '19 at 17:11