I am currently reading up on how to properly format used resources. Doing so I found out it is customary to distinguish between references and bibliography, the former being the list of sources actually referenced in the text, like
This was finding was made by Smith (2008)
and the latter being a list of materials used by the author that are not directly referenced in the text.
I would like to achieve this format with biblatex. Consider the following example
main.tex:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[american]{babel}
\usepackage[backend=biber, bibencoding=utf8, style=apa, natbib=true]{biblatex}
\DeclareLanguageMapping{american}{american-apa}
\addbibresource{sample.bib}
\begin{document}
A discussion of the subject can be found in \citet{Smith08}.
\nocite{Baker10}
\printbibliography[]
\end{document}
sample.bib:
@book{Smith08,
author = {Smith, E.},
year = {2008},
title = {The other book},
}
@book{Baker10,
author = {Baker, M.},
year = {2010},
title = {The book},
}
I would like the sources list generated to look like this, as Baker (2010) was not directly referenced but Smith (2008) was:
Bibliography
Baker, M. (2010). The book.
References
Smith, E. (2008). The other book.
I suspect this can be done with \DeclareBibliographyCategory somehow, but I can't figure out how.
But maybe there is even a better way as this seems like a standard format.

biblatex(>= 3.8) andbiblatex-apa(>= 7.5) [both released around November 2017; Overleaf has an older version], you don't need the\DeclareLanguageMapping{american}{american-apa}. – moewe Jun 11 '19 at 05:59