I use fp a lot. What is the point of modifying all the code?
I prefer the syntax of xfp but is this a sufficient argument?
You are going to say that \fpeval is expandable but what is the example
that can tilt the balance in favour of xfp ?
Maybe a Tag xfp would be useful ?
Update
After reading the comments and reading the linked documents, I specify what I am looking for :
- Speed : It's not a really argument for me, when we use TeX for calculations and geometric drawings I think we can wait a bit for a result.
- Functionality it's important
- Technical considerations (particularly expandability)
Do you have examples (with fp and xfp) that show that one is more functional than the other, or that xfp is expandable is a major asset or that not being expandable is sometimes useful?
pstrickscoordinates, which do not get parsed. Otherwise you'd have to define tons of macros for each component that is to be parsed. (Let's not discuss why one would still want to use pstricks. ;-) There are many additional examples where\numexprdoes not suffice because it basically only works with integers. Of course, if you use TikZ the advantage is much less pronounced since you can just define a function that usesfpand gets parsed wherever needed, as you know very well. – Jan 03 '20 at 23:30latex-dev '\stop'into a terminal:-) – David Carlisle Jan 03 '20 at 23:52lualatex-devto compile 170 pages of my new documentation with 200 pictures, it's fine !! – Alain Matthes Jan 04 '20 at 10:59