In below figure we pointed to <i,j>
But we wish to have a special symbol instead of <>. In the new symbol we expect that the angle between the two arms are larger than default <> i.e., the below symbols
In below figure we pointed to <i,j>
But we wish to have a special symbol instead of <>. In the new symbol we expect that the angle between the two arms are larger than default <> i.e., the below symbols
I think you're looking for \langle and \rangle.
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\( < i, j > \)
\( \langle i,j \rangle \)
\end{document}
Do you want increasing the size of \langle or \rangle? If the answer is "yes" you can choose the scalerel package to pag. 7 (for example):
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb}
\usepackage{scalerel}
\begin{document}
$\stretchto[200]{\langle}{20pt}x,y\stretchto[200]{\rangle}{20pt}$
\end{document}
If you want double \langle (\rangle) you can use \llangle or \rrangle with MnSymbol package.
Perhaps \left\langle ... \right\rangle? That should adjust the size to the contents.
\ll i',j'\ggwe cannot use\langle\langleorrangle\rangle– Inzo Babaria Mar 06 '20 at 15:41<< >>– Inzo Babaria Mar 06 '20 at 15:41\llangle\llanglewill indeed give a bad result. Some packages provide commands for that. What font are you using? – Vincent Mar 06 '20 at 15:59\usepackage{fourier}– Inzo Babaria Mar 06 '20 at 16:57\llangleand\rranglefrom theMnSymbolpackage or the commands\lAngleand\rAnglefrom thestixpackage could work, but using either of these packages will influence other symbols as well. Other options to double the\langleand\ranglesymbols are discussed here. – Vincent Mar 06 '20 at 17:01