4

I have been using dvipng to produce png images of latex equations to be embedded in html, and the output is very nice. However, for equations with a fraction, the non-fraction side produces a font which is too big, almost as though it has expanded to respect the height of the fraction. My latex is:

\documentclass[12pt]{article}

\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{amsfonts}

\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}

$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}$

\end{document}

and my command line arguments are

latex file.tex
dvipng -D 200 file.dvi -T tight -bg transparent

So for example, in this Maxwell equation, the 'del cross E' is noticably too large, whereas in a normal latex document this problem does not exist.

image

Is there anything wrong with my input?

egreg
  • 1,121,712
Commander Data
  • 43

1 Answers1

2

You're probably comparing this result with what you get when writing

\[
\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}
\]

When TeX typesets a formula to be displayed, as in the example above, it uses \displaystyle where fractions are bigger. The input

$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}$

produces a formula typeset in \textstyle, where fractions are reduced in size because the formula is supposed to be printed inline and large objects would spoil the pagination balance. Moreover, in \textstyle exponents are a bit lower than in \displaystyle.

You have two choices:

$\displaystyle\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \frac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}$

or

$\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \dfrac{\rho}{\varepsilon_0}$

(requires \usepackage{amsmath}): the \dfrac command typesets the fraction as if it were given in \displaystyle.

In this particular case there will be no difference among the two; there would be a slight difference if exponents are involved and a big difference for "big operators" such as \sum. Take your pick.

egreg
  • 1,121,712