1

I am currently writing protocolls with latex. I want to numerate my equations like this: (1.1), (2.3) and so on, but it´s only numbering from (1) to (n) without remarking the sections. My preamble is, but with it its not working how i want:

\documentclass[a4paper, 12pt]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[ngerman]{babel}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage{lmodern}
\usepackage{subfiles}
%\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,amsfonts,amsthm,mathtools}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{colortbl}
\definecolor{softgreen}{rgb}{.6,.98,.6}
\usepackage{parskip} %Deaktiviert Absatzeinrückung
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage{hyperref} %Anklicken von Referenzen ermöglichen
\usepackage[a4paper, includefoot, left=24mm, right=24mm, top=15mm, bottom=15mm]{geometry}
\usepackage{cleveref} %Referenzieren ermöglichen
\usepackage{chemformula}
\graphicspath{{Grafiken/}}
%\usepackage{uhrzeit}

\begin{document}


\section{Theoretische Grundlagen}


\begin{equation}
2 + 3 = 5
\end{equation}


\end{document}
Saurus
  • 31
  • Welcome to TeX.SX! Please clarify your desired output. In the title of the question you mention section and subsection, while the numbering scheme you describe in the body of the question only seems to incorporate the section number. – leandriis Jun 27 '20 at 09:15
  • 1
    Adding \counterwithin{equation}{section} to your preamble result in the equation begin numbered with 1.1. – leandriis Jun 27 '20 at 09:15
  • 1
    Entirely unrelated but you might be interested in cleaing up/restructuring your preamble a bit. For example, you can replace \usepackage{color} \usepackage{colortbl} wirh \usepackage[table]{xcolor}. Also, I would suggest using the enumitem package instead of enumerate as the former supersedes the latter. – leandriis Jun 27 '20 at 09:19
  • While it it for the most cases true that the load order of packages does not matter, there are some exceptions that you might want to keep in mind. hyperref should, with some exceptions like cleveref, be the last package in the preamble. So move geometry and chemformula before the hyperref package. – leandriis Jun 27 '20 at 09:21
  • Lastly, you should recieve a warning such as "Usage of package parskip together with a KOMA-Script class is not recommended." To get a somewhat similar output without using the parskip package, you can use the parskip=half class option. – leandriis Jun 27 '20 at 09:24

0 Answers0