This is a long comment and not an answer: Note that aside a "wiki:rtl" is a wrong key, the second a third footnotes of your example are not full references, but only the author and title. This short references could be regarded as unnecessary duplicates, but think in citations that are not contiguous or in different pages: If you are on page 85, it is hassle to have to go to page 12 to know which paper are you citing.
Anyway, for contiguous repeated citation, you can always use the manual solution of \footnotemark[\value{footnote}], but then, ... is not better just rewrite the text to cite it only once? Moreover, if there are the risk of include another unrelated footnote, between the references, it would produce the wrong results. For non-contiguous citations, this risk is bigger, and even if the result is correct, it is annoying had to check often the footnotes of another pages
An intermediate solution could be short citation as "Author, op. cit." using the verbose-trad1 style when the citation is not ambiguous (i,e., when there are not several works of the same author). This style do not reference the first citation as in verbose-inotes, but without making a new style, it is easy make a cross-reference manually. Example:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[paperheight=12cm,paperwidth=12cm]{geometry}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage[style=verbose-trad1]{biblatex}
%\usepackage[style=verbose-inote]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{biblatex-examples.bib}
\begin{document}
\lipsum[1][1]\autocite[\protect\label{x1}]{sigfridsson,shore}
\lipsum[2][1]\footnotemark[\value{footnote}]
\lipsum[3][1]\footnotemark[\value{footnote}]
\lipsum[4][1]\footnotemark[\value{footnote}]
\lipsum[5][1]\footnotemark[\value{footnote}]
\vfill\dotfill\par
(Affer dozen of pages and another cites ...)
{\renewcommand\thefootnote{}\footnote{\ldots \ldots \ldots }}
\setcounter{footnote}{58}
\par\dotfill\vfill
\lipsum[6][1]\autocite[][ see footnote \ref{x1}]{sigfridsson,shore}
%\lipsum[6][1]\autocite]{sigfridsson,shore} % for verbose-inote style
\newpage
\end{document}
\autocitecall produces a separate footnote. That's what the style is supposed to do. Maybe you are looking for something like https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/82670/35864, https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/35673/35864, https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/71526/35864, https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/20637/35864, https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/200286/35864 – moewe Feb 03 '21 at 08:19