1

So I'm writing a report and have included a glossary. I have internal link colours set to blue for referring to sections within the report but this carries over to the words in a glossary too which means my report is littered with lots of blue hyperlinked words... Is there a way to change the colour of these glossary links and not the section/chapter links. Apologies if my terminology is off.

% What I have tried so far
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{
  colorlinks   = true,    % Colours links instead of ugly boxes
  urlcolor     = blue,    % Colour for external hyperlinks
  linkcolor    = blue,    % Colour of internal links
  citecolor    = red      % Colour of citations
}

NOTE: Reference made is from an external .bib file.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

%Hyperlinks
\usepackage{hyperref}
\hypersetup{
  colorlinks   = true,    % Colours links instead of ugly boxes
  urlcolor     = blue,    % Colour for external hyperlinks
  linkcolor    = blue,    % Colour of internal links
  citecolor    = red      % Colour of citations
}


% Glossary stuff
\usepackage{glossaries}
\makeglossaries
\input{glossaries}


% Reference stuff
\usepackage{biblatex}
\addbibresource{references.bib}


\title{test}
\author{Example}
\date{March 2021}


\begin{document}


\maketitle


\section{Introduction}
This is a test sentence to say \gls{pt}. I want to cite this sentence\cite{tutorial:eoline} with a random reference from the bib file.
Would I use "gls{pruningtable}" every time I want to say \gls{pt}. Or would I just say pruning table from then on?


\printglossaries
\end{document}

enter image description here Is it conventional to replace every word with a "gls{term}" entry for every word I have?

curiousCoder
  • 43

0 Answers0