I have the following beamer presentation:
\documentclass{beamer}
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
\begin{document}
\section{First}
\begin{frame}[label=A]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image-a.jpg}
\end{frame}
\section{Second}
\begin{frame}[label=B]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image-b.jpg}
\end{frame}
\section{Third}
\begin{frame}[label=C]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image-c.jpg}
\end{frame}
\section{Fourth}
\begin{frame}[label=D]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Graphical abstract}
I would like here to have a reduced view of
frames A, B, C and D on one frame.
\end{frame}
\end{document}
The last frame should be a kind of graphical abstract of the presentation, i.e., I would like it to contain a reduced view of frames A, B, C, and D on one frame.
How should I achieve that?
Following the comments by Sam Carter below, I have tried the following simple and rogue solution :
\documentclass{beamer}
\setbeamertemplate{navigation symbols}{}
\begin{document}
\section{First}
\begin{frame}[label=A]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image-a.jpg}
\end{frame}
\section{Second}
\begin{frame}[label=B]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image-b.jpg}
\end{frame}
\section{Third}
\begin{frame}[label=C]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image-c.jpg}
\end{frame}
\section{Fourth}
\begin{frame}[label=D]
\noindent\includegraphics[width=\framewidth]{example-image}
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Graphical abstract}
I would like here to have a reduced view of frames A,
B, C and D one one frame.
\end{frame}
\begin{frame}
\scalebox{0.2}{\againframe{A}}\scalebox{0.2}{\againframe{B}}
\end{frame}
\end{document}
that gives me almost what I want, except that beamer is adding a lot of junk between my scaled frames.
Any ideas along thses line or am I being too rogue with beamer.


\usepackage{graphicx}, beamer loads it automatically – samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Sep 05 '22 at 12:07graphicx. I'll have a look at the question you pointed out. – Denis Sep 05 '22 at 12:13\usepackage{graphicx}is still not necessary :) – samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Sep 05 '22 at 13:51\frameinside of beamer frames. This latex definition of frame has nothing to do with the beamer definition of frame and basically just dumps the content of the frame into your overview frame. In your case with the big image, the result will have some similarity, but it will explode spectacularly as soon as the frame contains anything more complex. – samcarter_is_at_topanswers.xyz Sep 05 '22 at 14:06