I'm trying to cite a paper where there's an umlaut in the name of both one of the authors and of the journal.
I've looked here and here and I've tried:
@article{ResonantBhabhafor1980,
Author = {Reinhardt, J. and Scherdin, A. and M{\"{u}}ller, B. and Greiner, W.},
Journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"{u}}r Physik A Atomic Nuclei},
Number = {4},
Pages = {367--381},
Title = {Resonant Bhabha scattering at MeV energies},
Volume = {327},
Year = {1987}
}
But I'm getting the error Extra }, or forgotten \endgroup. How can I avoid this?
In case it's relevant, I'm including
\usepackage[backend=biber,sorting=none]{biblatex}
Extra context: putting the umlaut in the author field works, putting it in the journal field doesn't
More context: i finally got a mwe going:
\documentclass[]{report}
\usepackage[UKenglish]{babel} % useful to change date format
\usepackage{csquotes} % prevents a warning with babel
\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage[backend=biber,sorting=none]{biblatex}
\usepackage[capitalise]{cleveref}
\addbibresource{Bibliography.bib}
\usepackage{ulem}
\begin{document}
As discussed in \cite{ResonantBhabhafor1980}, Bhabha scattering provides an excellent method to study the potential existence of a particle of this nature.
\newpage
\printbibliography
\end{document}
commenting either \usepackage{ulem} or \usepackage[UKenglish]{babel} stops the error
\documentclassand ending with\end{document}, that generates the problem behavior you wish to fix. – Mico Jun 11 '23 at 14:50f{\"{u}}rin thejournalfield,f\"ursuffices. I get no error, however. If you plan to use BibTeX in other documents, write{Bhaba}and{MeV}in thetitlefield. – egreg Jun 11 '23 at 14:51\"uwith justuit compiles without errors, but when i put the umlaut back it give me the error above. – Beth Long Jun 11 '23 at 15:20.bibfile. But when I compile your example I get an error unless loadfontencwith the[T1]encoding (usingpdflatex). – Alan Munn Jun 11 '23 at 15:56hyperrefandcleverefare loaded last (as is usually good practice.) – Alan Munn Jun 11 '23 at 15:58\usepackage{ulem}is not what people actually want. More often than not people actually want\usepackage[normalem]{ulem}. But maybe you don't even needulemat all: Underlining is generally disliked in the world of typography (or in the LaTeX corner of that world, anyway). – moewe Jun 11 '23 at 20:52