I got some strange "underfull \vbox (badness 10000) detected at line ..." warnings, obviously at each of my "longtable"s. Is there a way to fix them (I actually don't see the cause) or do I have to ignore them?
Minimal working example (PdfLaTeX tells these warnings triply for each run on compiling with longtable [2000/10/22 v4.10 Multi-page Table package (DPC)]; each \demounderfullvbox might be replaced by the full example code or the source may be reduced to one longtable, what doesn't change behavior):
\documentclass[english,11pt,a4paper]{article}
\usepackage{longtable}
\newcommand{\demounderfullvbox}{%
\begin{longtable}{|l|p{2in}|}
%
\endfirsthead
%
\hline\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textsl{\ldots continued from previous page}}\\*
\endhead
%
\multicolumn{2}{|l|}{\textsl{will be continued on next page\ldots}}\\*
\hline
\endfoot
%
\hline
\endlastfoot
%
\hline%
aa: & 4711\\
\hline%
aaa: & 2\\
\hline%
aaaa: & 4711-2\\
\end{longtable}
}
\begin{document}
\newpage
%
\demounderfullvbox
\demounderfullvbox
\demounderfullvbox
\end{document}
If tabular is used instead of longtable, no warnings occur, but that doesn't solve the problem, as much more rows can be placed in the tables.
Removing the trailing \\ in the aaaa: line has no effect either.
The "underfull \vbox" warnings seem to specify a source line that looks ok to me (this is more clearly when \demounderfullvbox is replaced by the example code), think the warning is provocated on computation of first LTchunk?
Thanks for help and suggestions in advance!
\hlineposition was it... I must have moved it some days ago with the intent to have all "data" rows with the same source layout, but haven't recognized the side effect... Thank you very much for answering so quickly! – tueftl Sep 11 '12 at 12:52