Using natbib, bibentry. I would like if possible to render the bibentries in a different style than that in the Bibliography section in the end.
A particularity with this is that bibentry copies verbatim the style used for the entire bibliography and with the bsts like that of savetrees.bst (my case) or IEEEtran.bst or the like it creates a problem. Specifically, the repeated author(s) across two or more bib items that follow each other are replaced with a long dash --- except for the first bib item in such a sequence. When I use a \bibentry for some of these in the main body the dash is preserved, whereas I need the author(s) name(s) in the case of \bibentry while keeping it as it is in Bibliography with the dash.
MWE
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\usepackage[numbers]{natbib}
\usepackage{bibentry}
\nobibliography*
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@misc
{
death-star,
author = {Bevel Lemelisk and Wilhuff Tarkin and Darth Vader and Darth Sidious},
title = {{Death Star}},
howpublished = {Alderaan and Yavin 4},
year = {0 BBY}
}
@misc
{
death-star-2,
author = {Bevel Lemelisk and Wilhuff Tarkin and Darth Vader and Darth Sidious},
title = {{Death Star II}},
howpublished = {Endor},
year = {4 ABY}
}
\end{filecontents}
\begin{document}
\lipsum[1]
They first built~\cite{death-star}.
\begin{enumerate}
\item \textbf{Have:}\\
\bibentry{death-star-2}
\item \textbf{Need:}\\
B. Lemelisk, W. Tarkin, D. Vader, and D. Sidious, ``Death Star II,'' Endor, 4 ABY
\end{enumerate}
\lipsum[2]
%\bibliographystyle{savetrees}
\bibliographystyle{IEEETran}
\bibliography{\jobname}
\end{document}
natbib? This is probably easier to do withbiblatex. – Alan Munn Jul 20 '13 at 23:10natbib; IIRC for doi rendering and maybe something else. I am usingbibtex. I guess I never took time to investigatebiblatex---how can it be of help in this situation? I thought that'd a style question than a bib backend? – Serguei Jul 21 '13 at 01:25biblatexas described in here? – Serguei Jul 21 '13 at 01:37biblatexis very powerful and unless you are committed to usingnatbibbecause of journal requirements, it's probably worth looking into. – Alan Munn Jul 21 '13 at 04:23biblatexjust yet. While it's not for a journal right now, but a thesis, a simple naive attempt to switch generated a few errors and a whole bunch of warnings and no bibliography produced :( Looks like there is some conflict with existing (plenty) packages I am using. Plus, I am using existing.bsts and need a classical.bblas well. I also have a lot of bib items in my.bib. I am under extreme crunch time at the moment to devote time to debug it, so I will have to letbiblatexoption go for now. – Serguei Jul 21 '13 at 16:12biblatexsolution to this? – Serguei Oct 20 '13 at 20:04