3

I am writing the following mathematical definition:

... where for $i=1,\dotsc,n$, $Ag_i=(AS_i,\mathscr{K}_i)$, ...

which produces:

enter image description here

There are two kind of commas, one in 1, …, n and the other after n which is in text. How is it possible to make the two kinds of commas distinguishable so then it does not appear as though there is a missing formula after n.

Qrrbrbirlbel
  • 119,821
Ali
  • 1,331

1 Answers1

1

There are not many possibilities to distinguish these commas. As you can see, the math-mode and text-mode comma looks the same. You could redefine the font for the math-mode comma or set the single appearing text-mode comma locally in an other font, but that will look weird, I guess.

I am collecting the comments together with my own thoughts for other possibilities:

  • invert the sentence to get text between the two mathematical expressions
  • use some other text separator such as the semicolon
  • use some other math separator such as slash or semicolon
  • separate the first mathematical expression by brackets where (for $i=1,\dots,n$) $Ag_i=(AS_i,\mathscr{K}_i)$, or other stuff is ...
  • add some space with \quad or \qquad behind the first mathematical expressions to get a bigger visual separation

All this points are not really beautiful and as you tagged with "typography", you should consider to do, what I would do.

Rewrite the whole sentence. It is not forbidden to split in several sentences and to guide the reader through your text. This could look like:

In the following, I will present some formulae, including the counter $i$ which is defined as $i=1,\dotsc,n$. The possible formulae are $Ag_i=(AS_i,\mathscr{K}_i)$, ...

LaRiFaRi
  • 43,807