I would like to change the section/subsection style of my LaTeX document. The following is an example of what I would like:
3. Methodology and data: An explanation (Level 1. 12 font. In bold. Period after number.)
3.1. Empirical methods (Level 2. Subheading in italics NOT bold. Font size same as level 1. Periods after numbers.)
3.1.1. Testing vectors (Level 3. Subsubheading in italics NOT bold. Font size same as level 1. Periods after numbers.)
Similarly, the above section/subsection style should continue on for all subheadings.
I would like only the above changes to be applied to my entire document. I want all other section/subsection settings to remain as default (i.e, flushed left etc). Cross referencing should also remain as the default, e.g., 3.1.1. should be cross referenced as "3.1.1" (no italics and no period after the last number).
My MWE is currently:
\documentclass[twoside, a4paper, 12pt]{article}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\usepackage{booktabs,tabularx}
\usepackage{amsfonts}
\usepackage{amsthm}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\usepackage{verbatim}
\usepackage{amsmath, amssymb}
\usepackage{natbib}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{enumerate}
\usetikzlibrary{matrix, arrows}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{subfig}
\usepackage{listings}
\usepackage{color}
\usepackage{float}
\usepackage{multicol}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{cases}
\usepackage{multirow}
\usepackage[figuresright]{rotating}
\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{lscape}
\usepackage{longtable}
\usepackage{caption}
\usepackage{pslatex}
\usepackage[update,prepend]{epstopdf}
\usepackage[pdftex,colorlinks,linkcolor=black,citecolor=black]{hyperref}
\usepackage[official]{eurosym}
\setlength{\textwidth}{6.5in}
\setlength{\oddsidemargin}{0in}
\setlength{\evensidemargin}{0in}
\setlength{\parindent}{0pt}
\setlength{\parskip}{1ex plus 0.5ex minus 0.2ex}
\linespread{2}
\usepackage[top=1in, bottom=1in, left=1in, right=1in]{geometry}
\begin{document}
\bibliographystyle{apa-good}
\bibliography{bibliography}
\end{document}
\linespread[2]. There are several reasons not to do it. You alredy did load thesetspacepackage in your example preamble. Just call\onehalfspacinginstead. – Ruben Oct 24 '13 at 14:08\onehalfspacingproduce the same results as\linespread[2]? What is its advantage? – TrueTears Oct 24 '13 at 14:31\linespreaddoes also affect footnotes and list environments. In most of the cases this is not desirable andsetspacetakes care of these things. (See also l2tabu, p. 5) And your scepticism is totally appropriate :-) Probabilly the\doublespaingmacro is the analogue procedure. But I'm not completely certain about it. I would have to look this up too. – Ruben Oct 24 '13 at 15:35