When writing my question about various approaches to creating loops, I stumbled across the following anomaly
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pgffor}
\begin{document}
\begin{itemize}
\foreach \x in {apples, oranges,pears,,peaches}
{ \item \x }
\end{itemize}
\end{document}
which results in:

This is can be duplicated by just writing:
\begin{itemize}
\item apples
\item oranges
\item pears
{\item }
\item peaches
\end{itemize}
I cannot think of a reason why you would want to write {\item }. But, since I'm a teacher writing exams and quizzes, I often may want to use an \item with no following text.
What's happening here that the grouping is causing the \item not to render the bullet?
pearsandpeaches. – A.Ellett Oct 27 '13 at 17:47\strutimmediately after\itemin thepgfforloop. Are there any reasons why this might not be an ideal solution? – A.Ellett Oct 27 '13 at 17:50\mbox{}should be sufficient. Or a loop that doesn't group. – egreg Oct 27 '13 at 20:06\item[zzz]and the group means the box with the label is empty by the time it is used. – David Carlisle Oct 27 '13 at 23:36