I know how to make them do 1, 2, 3....just need to know 1.1, 1.2, 3.2, 3.3 etc
\begin{align}
\end{align}
This will produce 1, 2, 3 etc, I know this but need the other.
I know how to make them do 1, 2, 3....just need to know 1.1, 1.2, 3.2, 3.3 etc
\begin{align}
\end{align}
This will produce 1, 2, 3 etc, I know this but need the other.
The question can also be interpreted that the first number of the composite equation number should be the section number. The other two classes report and book are using composite equation numbers, whose first part is the chapter number. The article class does not have chapters and uses plain equation numbers.
Package amsmath (this is used because of align) provides an easy way to add the section number:
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
Complete example:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\numberwithin{equation}{section}
\begin{document}
\section{Equation numbering}
\begin{align}
a = a\\
b = b\\
c = c
\end{align}
\section{Second section}
\begin{gather}
d = d
\end{gather}
\end{document}
\numberwithin was not recognized for me, but \counterwithin{equation}{section} worked.
– marts
Jun 15 '17 at 12:01
\numberwithin requires package amsmath, where it is defined, as I have written in the answer.
– Heiko Oberdiek
Jun 15 '17 at 12:03
\numberwithin doesn't work. I've added the comment for other users who might stumble upon this problem.
– marts
Jun 15 '17 at 12:05
The amsmath package offers you the subequations environment; to get the desired formatting, you can redefine \theequation:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{subequations}
\begin{align}
y & = d \\
y & = cx+d \\
y & = bx^{2}+cx+d \\
y & = ax^{3}+bx^{2}+cx+d
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
\begin{subequations}
\renewcommand{\theequation}{\theparentequation.\arabic{equation}}
\begin{align}
y & = d \\
y & = cx+d \\
y & = bx^{2}+cx+d \\
y & = ax^{3}+bx^{2}+cx+d
\end{align}
\end{subequations}
\end{document}

subequations. See (possible duplicates) How to reference equations using letters and numbers; How to number a set of equations separately from another set? – Werner Jan 19 '14 at 02:11\documentclassuntil\end{document}could enable more users to answer your question. – jens_bo Jan 19 '14 at 02:24