While I use \citet{Titterington} and I use \bibliographystyle{unsrt} which all websites say is supposed to produce a citation in the main body like Titterington[1], for me produces a citation in the main body that looks like (author?)[1].
Asked
Active
Viewed 1.1k times
3
lockstep
- 250,273
-
Maybe this is an option How to emulate the traditional BibTeX styles (plain, abbrv, unsrt, alpha) as closely as possible with biblatex? – Marco Daniel Apr 26 '13 at 05:51
3 Answers
10
replace
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
by
\bibliographystyle{unsrtnat}
Found the solution from here:
http://www.latex-community.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=7950
ZYSTEEL
- 111
3
I did follow ZYSTEEL's answer but my problem was that every \cite{smith90} produced a text citation
Smith et al 1990
in my paper. As I wanted a text citation only when calling \citet{smith90}, I found that declaring \usepackage[numbers]{natbib} solved the problem for me. It was suggested in Herbert's answer, but it wasn't clear enough in my opinion.
moewe
- 175,683
Juan D'Adamo
- 31
- 2
1
I suppose you are using natbib. Use \usepackage[numbers]{natbib}. If it doesn't help, create a complete example.
F1iX
- 358