How can I validate the correctness a biblatex .bib file?
Where validate means checking for:
- Duplicate keys
- Missing mandatory fields
What tools do you use?
How can I validate the correctness a biblatex .bib file?
Where validate means checking for:
What tools do you use?
To validate my .bib files, I put together a Python script called Biblatex Checker.
It checks for missing fields, provides suggestions for common mistakes when using biblatex and identifies duplicate IDs.
It's based on BibTeX Check by Fabian Beck, which can be used for BibTeX files.
I use jabref. Install jabref, set it to biblatex mode. To do this go to Options → Preferences. In the window that opens, selectAdvanced and check BibLaTeX mode as shown below.

Then open your .bib file using jabref. Select the entries to be cleaned up. Under Tools menu, select cleanup entries. This window opens:

Now you know what to do :)
For duplicate keys, simply go to Tools → Autogenerate BibTeX keys. It will rewrite the duplicate key with some other name.
\c@abbrvpenalty=\count217. I'll try to find the "error".
– Nikos Alexandris
Oct 09 '15 at 08:22
If you are only given the .bib file, try
biber --tool --validate-datamodel <filename>.bib
If your TeX document uses custom data types, try
biber --validate-datamodel <filename>.bcf
This should check all data sources.
biber --validate-datamodel <texfilebasename> where <texfilebasename> is the basename of the .tex document you are writing at the moment.
– moewe
Oct 30 '18 at 10:33
.bib file. Users of custom data models probably already know that biber can replace 3rd party tools.
– pavel
Oct 31 '18 at 11:14
biber --tool did not catch the four obvious errors in @article{sugfridsson, editor = {Sigfridsson, Emma and Ryde, Ulf}, title = {Title}, blournal = {Journal}, } that --validate-datamodel reported. So at least for the mandatory field validation --tool mode alone is not enough. I guess what I'm saying is that your answer would be better if you suggested biber --validate-datamodel --tool <filename>.bib
– moewe
Oct 31 '18 at 11:29
\documentclass{article}
\begin{document}
\nocite{*}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{mybib}
\end{document}
Run latex and bibtex and then look into the logfile of the bibtex run (<filename>.blg). It has all warnings.
https://biblatex-linter.herokuapp.com/ provides an online Bibtex linter.
It's an Heroku app (Python/Django). It's open source and MIT licensed. https://github.com/Pezmc/BibLaTeX-Linter.
It's based on https://github.com/Pezmc/BibLaTeX-Check
BibTex Tidy is an open source online tool, I've used it, and personally I found it to be very reliable. It supports formatting and clean up, but also checks duplicate entries, including not just the key but also titles.
The tool's self-description is:
This tool tidies bibtex files by fixing inconsistent whitespace, removing duplicates, removing unwanted fields, and sorting entries.
bibtool (github) v2.68 has improved its double check (aka check for duplicates):
check.double has been
generalized. The requirement of double entries to be adjacent
has been dropped. This has the impact that the processing is
slightly slower.and added a new check unique.field:
unique.field introduced. With this
resource it is possible to specify additional unique constraints
for fields. If different records have the same value for one of
those fields, then a warning is issued.Ensure you have v2.68 or newer (Homebrew for macOS already provides this version when this answer was written, ie. $ brew upgrade bib-tool gives you the new version)
❯ bibtool -V
BibTool Vers. 2.68 (C) 1996-2019 Gerd Neugebauer
Following command reports records which share the same $key
❯ bibtool -- 'unique.field {$key}' -o '' unique_field_test.bib
For example, you could also check for duplicate dois.
❯ bibtool -- 'unique.field {doi}' -o '' unique_field_test.bib
I am not sure if this is already possible with bibtool.
On top of the tools that have already been suggested, you can try my bibcop package. You just \usepackage it in the document and any errors found in the .bib file will be reported as LaTeX warnings right in the TeX log:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{bibcop}
\begin{document}
\bibliographystyle{plain}
\bibliography{main}
\end{document}
Bibcop checks the formatting of the author, title, year, month, pages, and so on. If is written in Perl and you are welcome to submit your suggestions if you want it to be even stricter (it is pretty strict already!).
BTW, you can also use it as a command line tool to auto-fix your .bib file:
$ tlmgr install bibcop
$ bibcop --fix my.bib > fixed.bib
{{}} on the other hand means that a different style (thinking of my former institution which explicitly wants titles with only the first character capitalised (except acronyms)) would not be able to apply the correct (for them) capitalisation. A tool to check the validity of a file should not ask to counteract a style.
– ArTourter
Dec 19 '22 at 15:54
nocaps, which will disable this particular checker. Also, nobrackets to disable the checker for double brackets.
– yegor256
Dec 19 '22 at 17:20
biber --tool -V bib.bib. It doesn't complain about missing fields but I didn't try yet to find out how to change it (or in case in can't do it yet to make a feature request). – Ulrike Fischer Apr 26 '14 at 18:52-Vin tool mode didn't do anything in 1.8. It does in 1.9 dev version. For example it will report on mandatory fields missing from the default data model (in the tool mode config file). You can add any datamodel constraint you want to the data model (either by biblatex macros or via the biber config file for tool mode). Theblx-dm.deffile that comes with biblatex contains the default data model and its mandatory field constraints. – PLK Apr 26 '14 at 22:42biber --tool -V my.bibshould be a separate answer and, IMHO, the recommended way. I definitely would vote for it. – Hotschke Feb 02 '17 at 12:39