The font has only the fi and fl ligatures, which are actually unnecessary; the ff, ffi and ffl ligatures are obtained in the virtual font by putting together two f's or an f with fi or fl respectively; here is the relevant part for ffl:
tftopl uopr7t
First of all, let's look at f:
(CHARACTER C f
(CHARWD R 0.276)
(CHARHT R 0.745999)
(CHARDP R 0.0055)
(COMMENT
(LIG C i O 14)
(LIG C f O 13)
(LIG C l O 15)
[...]
So ff is octal 13:
(CHARACTER O 13
(CHARWD R 0.573)
(CHARHT R 0.745999)
(CHARDP R 0.0055)
(COMMENT
(LIG C i O 16)
(LIG C l O 17)
[...]
Thus ffl is at position octal 17.
vptovf uopr7t
[...]
(DESIGNSIZE R 10.0)
[...]
(MAPFONT D 0
(FONTNAME uopr8r)
(FONTCHECKSUM O 35406442446)
(FONTAT R 1.0)
(FONTDSIZE R 10.0)
)
This says what font the glyphs are taken from. Let's see octal 17:
(CHARACTER O 17
(CHARWD R 0.834)
(CHARHT R 0.745999)
(CHARDP R 0.0055)
(COMMENT
(KRN C v R -0.019)
(KRN C y R -0.021)
)
(MAP
(SETCHAR C f)
(MOVERIGHT R 0.021)
(SETCHAR O 3)
)
)
This says that the character f is typeset, there is a kern of 0.21pt (the design size is 10pt) and then character octal 3 is used; in the raw font, the fl ligature is there.
The same kerning is applied when building the ff ligature. However, this results in the two f's being farther apart than they would be without the ligature, as your picture shows.
It seems to have been done not too carefully; my suggestion is to disable all f ligatures.
\documentclass[a5paper,12pt]{article}
\usepackage{microtype}
\DisableLigatures[f]{encoding=*,family=uop}
\renewcommand*{\sfdefault}{uop}
\begin{document}
\thispagestyle{empty}
\noindent % show that ligatures are not disabled altogether
Muffling affluent waffles\\
baffles sniffling Mifflin.
\sffamily
\noindent % but only for the classico font
Muffling affluent waffles\\
baffles sniffling Mifflin.
\end{document}

uopb8r.pl, neither146(octal code forf) nor257(fl) are anywhere to be found. Which is odd because the above example clearly shows that some ligaturing involving the letter "f" is going on and an "ff" ligature doesn't seem to be part of the font according to fontforge. – Christian Apr 27 '14 at 18:03tftopl uopr7t, not using the “raw” font. – egreg Apr 27 '14 at 18:09ffrom theflmight be a feature as in "intended by the font designer". Who were I to argue with Mr Zapf in that case. – Christian Apr 27 '14 at 18:09146or257. – Christian Apr 27 '14 at 18:32getnonfreefonts-sys classicohttp://micahyi.blogspot.de/2012/05/install-non-free-font-for-latex-tex.html – Christian Apr 27 '14 at 19:00