I'm having some problems with my figure: I want the thick arrows (labeled epsilon+ and epsilon-) to extend all the way to the intersections they are pointing towards.
If I change the line length in the "intersection of" statement like:
(intersection of 100:2--+10:100 and 30:2--+120:100)
i.e. 100 instead of 4, the arrows get longer, but still not all the way there...
What explains this behaviour? Is it caused by the relative coordinates specifying the lines?
Do lines have to actually intersect to specify a coordinate using the "intersection of" or are they extended as needed to perform the calculation? (In my case, they are, but just wondering)
This is my first figure made with TikZ, and all input is appreciated. I'm thinking of resorting to using GeoGebra and exporting as TikZ or PDF, but I haven't quite given in yet.
Kind regards,
Snorre Olsen

\documentclass[•]{article}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=1]
\tikzstyle weak=[gray, very thin, text=black]
% Direction arrows
\draw[->] (0,0) -- (210:6) node[below] {To base station B};
\draw[->] (0,0) -- (280:4) node[below] {To base station A};
\draw (210:0.5) arc(210:280:0.5) node[midway, below] {$\gamma$};
% Shifted versions of LoP's
\draw[weak] (0,0) -- node[left] {$\Delta_\text{A+}$} (100:2) +(190:4) -- +(10:4) node[right] {LoP$_\text{A+}$};
\draw[weak] (0,0) -- node[below right] {$\Delta_\text{B+}$} (30:2)
+(120:4) -- +(300:4) node[below] {LoP$_\text{B+}$};
\draw[weak] (0,0) -- node[right, black] {$\Delta_\text{A-}$}(280:2)
+(190:4) -- +(10:4) node[right] {LoP$_\text{A-}$};
% Resulting error vectors
\draw[->,thick] (0,0) -- node[above left] {$\epsilon_+$}(intersection of 100:2--+10:4 and 30:2--+120:4);
\draw[->,thick] (0,0) -- node[below] {$\epsilon_-$}(intersection of 280:2--+10:4 and 30:2--+300:4);
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}

intersection-2(where does the 2 come from?) but I will read up on this. – Snorre O. May 15 '14 at 11:07intersection-1) didn't work either. You can have multiple intersections between two paths, and the number indicates which one is used. I didn't think too much about your original code either, but I'll have a look, and update my answer if I figure it out. – Torbjørn T. May 15 '14 at 11:12(intersection of...)was in 2.0, but is not in the documentation of2.1. So it's even older ;) – Kpym Dec 17 '14 at 07:29