I tried to get characters in math-environment bold such that they look like this (picture taken from a book - pdf-sample: link):

However, neither \mathbf{xyz} nor \boldsymbol{\mathrm{xyz}} work in order to get the characters bold enough. In fact it is hard to distinguish bold from non-bold characters. This is the code I tried:
\documentclass[english]{scrartcl}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[latin9]{inputenc}
\usepackage{textcomp}
\usepackage{amstext}
\usepackage{babel}
\begin{document}
As an application of these results, consider the case in which $\mathbf{X}_{1}$
is $\mathbf{i}$, a constant term that is a column of 1s in the first
column of $\mathbf{X}$. The solution for $b_{2}$ in this case will
then be the slopes in a regression that contains a constant term.
Using Theorem 3.2 the vector of residuals for any variable in $\mathbf{X}_{2}$
in this case will be
$\mathbf{x\text{\textasteriskcentered}}=\mathbf{x}-\mathbf{X}_{1}(\mathbf{X}_{1}'\mathbf{X}_{1})^{-1}\mathbf{X}_{1}\mathbf{x}$
$\textrm{x\text{\textasteriskcentered}}=\textrm{x}-\textrm{X}_{1}(\textrm{X}_{1}'\textrm{X}_{1})^{-1}\textrm{X}_{1}\textrm{x}$
\end{document}
Is there a trick how one can get "extra-bold" characters?
BR Fabian
PS: I've tried pretty much all proposals on how to get characters bold that I've found on the internet.



nand1, for instance. Use\mathbf{x}{*} instead of that complicated construction; also^{'}should simply be'`. – egreg Aug 19 '14 at 21:32\documentclass{...}and ending with\end{document}. It would be particularly useful to know which font you use. However, a full MWE is the best thing. – yo' Aug 19 '14 at 21:57