33

I hope nobody minds me asking, but why are there separate STIX and XITS math fonts, and how can I go about deciding which one I should use? Which one is best suited for which purpose? Is one of the two better than the other?

John Sonderson
  • 695
  • 3
    STIX Math is the officially released font; XITS Math is the same, but with some table added that makes it in a better shape for unicode-math. – egreg Feb 08 '15 at 16:15
  • 5
    work is underway to provide (la)tex support for the stix fonts as well as other "cleanup". the xits fonts were based on an early (beta) release of the stix fonts. when the stix fonts with tex support are finally released, i think they should be preferred, but there should be very little difference, really. – barbara beeton Feb 08 '15 at 16:46
  • So, given @barbarabeeton's comment, XITS math is something of the past, given that it only has some (performance?) advantages when used with unicode-math, and future versions of (la)tex will make these obsolete, while improving support for STIX. I hope I've understood correctly. – John Sonderson Feb 08 '15 at 16:54
  • 3
    XITS adds complete and well tested OpenType math layout support to STIX fonts (plus right-to-left math support) i.e. the stuff you need to have proper math layout in XeTeX and LuaTeX when using OpenType fonts. The current version of STIX fonts provide similar layout, but it is incomplete and have known bugs, work is underway to fix this in version 2 of STIX fonts (unreleased yet). – خالد حسني Feb 08 '15 at 19:07
  • 1
    I look forward to the strengths of both STIX and XITS being brought together and merged into one STIX 2 package, with all their implemented functionality and features merged and bugfixes sorted out. So, would it be correct to say, that the current version of STIX has the fonts, but doesn't have math layout support, that is, no way to format something like $e^{\pi^(\abs{y\boxplus x})}$, whereas XITS OpenType math layout would somehow support this and redimension everything for you needed? – John Sonderson Feb 08 '15 at 19:45
  • What if I want to use something like that in Adobe Illustrator? Do I have to resize all characters by hand, or is there a plugin to allow me to enter LaTeX into Illustrator (or Inkscape)? – John Sonderson Feb 08 '15 at 19:46
  • The [tag:stix] tag wiki needs some love. – Martin Schröder Feb 11 '15 at 14:32
  • @KhaledHosny Looks like STIX 2 has been released. Does that mean XITS is now completely obsolete? – Timothy Gu Dec 09 '19 at 03:01

1 Answers1

20

For a bit of historical context, when the STI Pub released v1.0.0 of the STIX fonts it did not have any math layout support neither for TFM files for traditional TeX engines nor OpenType layout for modern TeX engines. XITS started as a community effort to provide OpenType layout support and make the STIX fonts usable with engines that support OpenType math layout (namely XeTeX, LuaTeX as well as Microsoft Office 2007 and later).

Later STI Pub released a version of STIX fonts with OpenType math layout, but it was incomplete and had known bugs, so XITS remains preferable if one wants to use unicode-math package.

A bit later, STIX support files for traditional TeX engines was released (the stix packages), but XITS does not provide equivalent support, so if one wants to use STIX fonts in a traditional LaTeX setup, the stix package is the only option (and it works in XeTeX and LuaTeX, too, but using the traditional font machinery of course).

STI Pub is working on next version of STIX fonts that should provide better OpenType math layout and revised glyph shapes (among other things), so it would supersede XITS in certain ways (XITS would still be useful for people who prefer the existing design, or want to do right-to-left math).

خالد حسني
  • 22,859