4

I have this two simple images: 

\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{tikz}
\begin{document}
    \fbox{\tikz{% 
        \fill[red!20] (0,0) to[in=210,out=30] (10,0) -- (10,1) -- (0,1) -- cycle;
        }}

    \bigskip

    \fbox{\tikz{% 
        \fill[red!20] (0,0) -- (10,0) -- (10,1) -- (0,1) -- cycle;
        }}
\end{document}

And I am quite surprised about the bounding box of the first one:

Result with wildly different b-b

Is it possible to achieve (automatically) tighter bounding box when using to[in=..., out=...] construct?

Rmano
  • 40,848
  • 3
  • 64
  • 125
  • 2
    Short answer no. Longer is here : http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/43621/bounding-box-is-larger-than-expected-when-drawing-a-curved-path and here http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/238395/why-do-coordinates-in-bezier-curves-add-to-the-padding-in-tikz – percusse May 05 '15 at 20:24
  • @percusse --- thanks. I think it's really a dupe, I was not able to find them... – Rmano May 05 '15 at 20:36

0 Answers0