Coming from MS Powerpoint I usually use SmartForms or other objects to highlight specific points in a picture or a table to draw the viewers attention. Just imagine a technical drawing and I want a big fat arrow pointing at a certain piece of that drawing. Or an arrow pointing to a certain number in a table.
So in Powerpoint I just use drag and drop and put the arrow where I want it to be, if I want to move the picture I put picture and arrow in a group and move them together.
In beamer I use the textpos package to place my object on the frame:
\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}
the grid is supposed to help me doing that:
\setbeamertemplate{background}[grid][step=10mm]
but unfortunately it starts in the bottom-left corner of the frame, but textpos' origin is the top-left corner. That's a little annoying, how to get the grid right? Even if that would work it is still quite some pain in the ... to place the object correctly, and requires multiple compilations.
Now I edit my table or move my picture and the fiddly placement procedure starts again.
Here is the MWE showing an example:
\documentclass{beamer}
\usepackage[absolute,overlay]{textpos}
\usepackage{booktabs}
\usepackage{tabularx}
\newcolumntype{Y}{>{\centering\arraybackslash}X}
\usepackage{bbding}
\newcommand{\BigArrow}{\scalebox{5}[1]\ArrowBoldRightShort\!}
\setbeamertemplate{background}[grid][step=10mm]
\begin{document}
\begin{frame}
\begin{table}
\begin{tabularx}{\textwidth}{YYY}
\toprule
\textbf{Treatments} & \textbf{Response 1} & \textbf{Response 2}\\
\midrule
Treatment 1 & 0.0003262 & 0.512 \\
Treatment 2 & 0.0015681 & 0.910 \\
Treatment 3 & 0.0009271 & 0.296 \\
\bottomrule
\end{tabularx}
\end{table}
\begin{textblock*}{0mm}(80mm,37.875mm)
\BigArrow
\end{textblock*}%
\begin{textblock*}{0mm}(106mm,49.5mm)
\HandLeftUp
\end{textblock*}%
\end{frame}
\end{document}

As you can see, I actually want to place the arrow exactly between the two top row elements of the last two columns and let the finger point on the last number. But I don't want to alter the table itself.
I'm looking for something like:
...
Treatment 1 & 0.0003262 \setanchorpoint{1} & 0.512 \\
Treatment 2 & 0.0015681 & 0.910 \\
Treatment 3 & 0.0009271 & 0.296\setanchorpoint{2} \\
...
...
\begin{textblock*}{0mm}(\getanchorpointX{1}+10mm,\getanchorpointY{1}+0mm)
\BigArrow
\end{textblock*}%
\begin{textblock*}{0mm}(\getanchorpointX{2}+5mm,\getanchorpointY{2}+5mm)
\HandLeftUp
\end{textblock*}%
Is that possible?
If not, what general approach would you recommend to place objects relatively to others?
In case of tables for example I wouldn't consider it a good option to insert "invisible" rows and columns to insert the arrow and finger. Grouping multiple overlaying pictures seems more feasible though.
I hope this question is not too broad. But I'm quite enthusiastic about the possibilities beamer offers me. This question is the last huge drawback of beamer over Powerpoint for me, and if there is the time pressure to get the presentation ready in a day, I'd probably would rather go and use Powerpoint to get the work done, but I actually don't want to. To big are the advantages of Latex. As you see I'm not talking about perfect typesetting of presentations, sometimes these dirty tricks are just necessary.
Latex always gives me the "Everything can be done!" impression, so what is the magic trick in this case?
For further illustration a slide of one of my Powerpoint presentations and the objects I'd like to place as described in this question marked with red:


0.0003262in this case. It would be more logical to use the lower left corner of the "object" instead, but I have a hard time to change the macro accordingly. Can you help? do you know what I mean? So after the change0.0003262\putto{8mm}{0mm}\BigArrow & 0.512should lead to a similar result. – Robert Seifert May 07 '15 at 17:20