In his answer to this question, our friend @egreg explains:
It happens that certain combination of letters have “bad” spacing.
I have noticed this too. As I understand it, LaTeX is supposed to make producing beautiful documents easy, by taking care of the formatting for you, so that you can focus on the content.
Now, obviously, "good" and "bad" kerning is quite subjective - witness @egreg's scare quotes. And yet, in the linked example, I'd say the case is pretty clear cut.
So, I'm wondering if anybody knows of any references which explain the rationale behind LaTeX's kerning decisions.
Are there any plans to modify LaTeX's kerning behaviour, or is this behaviour desired?
Also, is there any package which allows you to systematically alter the kerning across the document - so that you don't have to fiddle around yourself on a case by case basis?
Microtypecan do that, andfontspec, I guess, can do it for opentype fonts (forxe/luaætex. But normally it is not latex's job: kerning the font author's job, and kerning is writtel in the .otor.ttffont files. – Bernard May 22 '15 at 21:59\textit{cC}. In math mode it's different, because different rules are used. If you note, the C in math mode is “rounder” than the text italic C. I added some more words about the subject. – egreg May 22 '15 at 22:33