The following code produces an image like this:

\newcommand{\mywidth}{1.4cm}
\newcommand{\myheight}{7mm}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\node[draw, rectangle, minimum height=\myheight, minimum width=\mywidth,
font=\tiny, xshift=0*\mywidth, label={[shift={(-0.6,0)}, font=\tiny]0},
fill=red!20] (n1) {foo};
\node[draw, rectangle, minimum height=\myheight, minimum width=\mywidth,
font=\tiny, xshift=1*\mywidth, label={[shift={(-0.6,0)}, font=\tiny]1},
fill=blue!20] (n2) {bar};
\node [tape, draw, rotate=90, minimum height=\mywidth/2,
minimum width=\myheight, tape bend top=none, tape bend height=0.1cm,
label={[shift={(0.35,0.55)}, font=\tiny]2}] at (2*\mywidth-4mm,0) (n3) {};
\node [tape, draw, rotate=90, minimum height=\mywidth/2,
minimum width=\myheight, tape bend bottom=none, tape bend height=0.1cm,]
at (2*\mywidth + 4mm,0) (n4) {};
\end{tikzpicture}
I found inspiration for drawing the wiggly lines in this awesome answer.
However, it is really tedious to position the elements with the wiggly lines. Since they are rotated, minimum height=... actually sets their width. The same is true for the label, since the anchor was of course rotated too. I had to try around for quite a while to position the label more or less correctly (it is still a little bit off).
Is there a way to make the last two nodes behave like the first node? Ideally, I'd like to behave these two nodes together in the same way as the "foo" or "bar"-node. If that is not possible, I'd at least like to avoid this very confusing and tricky way of position the label, the node and setting the node height and width.
\draw [double] (my node.south) <curvy specification> (my node.north);then it should look right, though you'll probably need to specifyinner sep=0ptfor the nodes. Might be easier, though. – cfr Jul 13 '15 at 13:54