6

This question is tied to my other question about French section numbering using bis, ter, etc. The previous question gave me a method to number the different sections with the latin bis, ter, and others in sequential order.

Now I am trying to cross-reference these sections but the cross reference numbering is not working out correctly. Please consider the MWE below, which is slightly tweaked from the answer to the aforementioned question.

\documentclass{book}
\usepackage{xparse}
\usepackage{enumitem}
\usepackage[explicit]{titlesec}
\usepackage{lipsum}
\usepackage{calc}
\usepackage{totcount}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\ExplSyntaxOn
\seq_new:N \bislist
\seq_set_split:Nnn \bislist {;} {bis;ter;quater;quinquies;sexies;septies;octies;novies;decies}

\NewDocumentCommand {\bisprint} {m}
 {
  \seq_item:Nn \bislist {#1}
 }
\ExplSyntaxOff

\newtotcounter{bismax}
\newcounter{bis}
\stepcounter{bis}
\setcounter{bismax}{1}

\newcommand{\bisadd}{\stepcounter{bis} \setcounter{bismax}{\minof{4}{\maxof{\thebismax}{\thebis-1}}}}

\AtBeginDocument{\newlength{\bislength}
\settowidth{\bislength}{\textit{\bisprint{\totvalue{bismax}}}}
\addtolength{\bislength}{1.5em}}

\titleformat{\section}[block]{\normalfont\large\normalfont\filcenter}{\thesection. --- #1}{0.5em}{}[\setcounter{bis}{1}]

\renewcommand\thesection{\arabic{section}}

\titleformat{name=\section,numberless}[block]{\normalfont\large\normalfont\filcenter}{\arabic{section} \textit{\bisprint{\arabic{bis}}}. --- #1}{0.5em}{}[ \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\protect\numberline{\arabic{section} \textit{\bisprint{\arabic{bis}}}}#1} \bisadd{}]

\makeatletter
\renewcommand*\l@section{\@dottedtocline{1}{1.5em}{\bislength}}
\makeatother

\begin{document}



\tableofcontents

\section{First section header}\label{Sec1}
\lipsum[5]
\section*{Second section header}\label{Sec1bis}
\lipsum[6]
\section*{Third section header}\label{Sec1ter}
\lipsum[7]
Let's reference Section \ref{Sec1bis} and \ref{Sec1ter} here.  This should have said "Section 1 \textit{bis} and Section 1 \textit{ter}."  You will see that the cross-references do not work out correctly.

\end{document}

This produces the following output:

No. 1
No. 2

As you can see, the last paragraph attempts to cross-reference Sections 1 bis and 1 ter, but the Latin ordinals aren't properly shown. I assume this has something to do with the \section* command, but I really don't know for sure.

grfrazee
  • 969

2 Answers2

3

Here's an idea with minimal impact on the usual commands: with \section+ you introduce a “bis” section. When a \section without suffix is scanned, the normal counter is stepped and the bis counter is reset.

\documentclass{book}

\usepackage{xparse}
\usepackage{titlesec}
\usepackage{hyperref}

\usepackage{lipsum}

\titleformat{\section}[block]
  {\normalfont\large\normalfont\filcenter}
  {\thesection. --- }
  {0em}
  {}

\ExplSyntaxOn
\cs_set_eq:NN \origsection \section

\RenewDocumentCommand{\section}{s t+ o m }
 {
  \IfBooleanTF{#1}
   { \origsection* { #4 } }
   {
    \stepcounter{Hsection}
    \IfBooleanTF{#2}
     {
      \addtocounter{section}{-1}
      \stepcounter{bis}
     }
     {
      \setcounter{bis}{1}
     }
    \IfNoValueTF{#3}
     { \origsection { #4 } }
     { \origsection [ #3 ] { #4 } }
   }
 }

\DeclareExpandableDocumentCommand {\bisprint} {}
 {
  \int_case:nnF { \value{bis} }
   {
    {0}{}
    {1}{}
    {2}{~bis}
    {3}{~ter}
    {4}{~quater}
    {5}{~quinquies}
    {6}{~sexies}
    {7}{~septies}
    {8}{~octies}
    {9}{~novies}
    {10}{~decies}
   }
   { ~ HEY! }
 }
\ExplSyntaxOff

\renewcommand{\thesection}{\arabic{section}\textit{\bisprint}}
\newcounter{bis}
\newcounter{Hsection}


\begin{document}



\tableofcontents

\section{First section header}\label{Sec1}
\lipsum[5]
\section+{Second section header}\label{Sec1bis}
\lipsum[6]
\section+{Third section header}\label{Sec1ter}
\lipsum[7]

Let's reference Section \ref{Sec1bis} and \ref{Sec1ter} here.  This should have said "Section 1 
\textit{bis} and Section 1 \textit{ter}."  You will see that the cross-references do not work out 
correctly.

\section{This should be 2}

\section+{This should be 2bis}

\end{document}

enter image description here

I leave to you further refinements.

egreg
  • 1,121,712
  • I have other syntax that requires \usepackage[explicit]{titlesec} to work. Putting the [explicit] flag in makes the section headers in the body of the document disappear with your syntax. How can I avoid this? – grfrazee Sep 17 '15 at 20:36
  • @grfrazee My experience is that the explicit option is almost never needed. If you must use it, put #1 in the now empty pair of braces at the end of the \titleformat command. – egreg Sep 17 '15 at 20:40
  • Perfect. Thanks. I especially like that this solution doesn't redefine the \section*{} command, which was something that didn't quite sit well with me on my MWE. – grfrazee Sep 17 '15 at 20:43
2

You can change your numberless \titleformat to the following:

\makeatletter
\providecommand{\phantomsection}{}% To work with hyperref, if needed
\titleformat{name=\section,numberless}[block]
  {\normalfont\large\normalfont\filcenter}
  {\phantomsection% Set hyperref mark
   \protected@xdef\@currentlabel{\thesection~\textit{\bisprint{\arabic{bis}}}}%
   \arabic{section} \textit{\bisprint{\arabic{bis}}}. --- #1}
  {0.5em}
  {}
  [ \addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\protect\numberline{\arabic{section} \textit{\bisprint{\arabic{bis}}}}#1} \bisadd{}]
\makeatother

This updates \@currentlabel - used by the \label-\ref system to include your \bisprint-ed number.

enter image description here

The above also works as expected when hyperref is used.

Werner
  • 603,163
  • I believe that all that's still needed to do in order to make this code work with hyperref is to change the two instances of \stepcounter to \refstepcounter. – Mico Sep 16 '15 at 20:15
  • Apologies, I forgot to add hyperref to my MWE. What would have to be done to get this to work with hyperref? – grfrazee Sep 16 '15 at 20:15
  • @Mico, thanks, I was typing my comment when you posted yours. I'll give that a try. – grfrazee Sep 16 '15 at 20:16
  • @grfrazee: See the minor update to the answer, which adds \phantomsection where needed. – Werner Sep 16 '15 at 20:24