I've tried to define a new description environment for quotations from Wittgenstein's Tractatus, indented on both sides and single space. The main text is one and half space:
\usepackage[inline,shortlabels]{enumitem}
\newlist{tlpquote}{description}{1}
\setlist[tlpquote]{font=\normalfont,parsep=6pt,itemsep=6pt,topsep=6pt,align=left,labelindent=27pt,labelwidth=36pt,labelsep*=11pt,leftmargin=!,rightmargin=27pt,before=\singlespacing,after=\onehalfspacing}
However, the result seems to make the normal paragraph after the quotation single spaced. Moreover, if I have only one item in the list, it's one and half spaced, not single spaced.
I use the following to make the quote environment single spaced (I found this on sx.xs):
\let\oldquote\quote
\let\oldendquote\endquote
\renewenvironment{quote}{\vspace{\dimexpr-12pt-\topsep+\baselineskip\relax}\begin{spacing}{1}\oldquote}
{\oldendquote\end{spacing}\vspace{\dimexpr-12pt-\topsep+\baselineskip\relax}}
and this works just fine. I figure I don't understand the before= and after= options of enumitem. (Of course, there's actually very little about enumitem that I do actually understand, as opposed to being able to make work, mostly with the help of answers here :-)
Here's an MWE:
\documentclass[11pt,oneside]{extbook}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage{geometry}
\geometry{verbose,tmargin=1in,bmargin=1in,lmargin=1in,rmargin=1in}
\pagestyle{plain}
\setcounter{secnumdepth}{3}
\setcounter{tocdepth}{3}
\usepackage{setspace}
\onehalfspacing
\usepackage[inline,shortlabels]{enumitem}
\newlist{tlpquote}{description}{1}
\setlist[tlpquote]{font=\normalfont,parsep=6pt,itemsep=6pt,topsep=6pt,align=left,labelindent=27pt,labelwidth=36pt,labelsep*=11pt,leftmargin=!,rightmargin=27pt,before=\singlespacing,after=\onehalfspacing}
% single space in quotes
\let\oldquote\quote
\let\oldendquote\endquote
\renewenvironment{quote}{\vspace{\dimexpr-12pt-\topsep+\baselineskip\relax}\begin{spacing}{1}\oldquote}
{\oldendquote\end{spacing}\vspace{\dimexpr-12pt-\topsep+\baselineskip\relax}}
\usepackage{ragged2e}
\RaggedRight
\setlength{\parindent}{18pt}
\newcommand{\forceindent}{\leavevmode{\parindent=1cm\indent}}
\begin{document}
The puzzles mount up when Wittgenstein brings in the notions of use,
projection, and sense to characterize propositional signs and propositions:
\begin{tlpquote}
\item [{3.11}] We use the sense-perceptible sign (sound or written sign,
etc.) of the proposition as a projection of the possible situation.
The method of projection is the thinking of the sense of the proposition.
\item [{3.12}] {[}T{]}he proposition is the propositional sign in its \emph{projective
relation} to the world.
\item [{3.13}] To the proposition belongs everything which belongs to the
projection, but not what is projected.
In the proposition, therefore, its \emph{sense is not yet contained},
but the possibility of expressing it.
\end{tlpquote}
\noindent Answering these questions is complicated by the fact that in the \emph{Tractatus}
there are a number of further characterizations of the notion of sense.
As we saw in the last section there is a notion of sense of pictures
as a possible situation. It's clear that this holds for propositions
as well:
\begin{tlpquote}
\item [{4.031(2)}] One can say, instead of, This proposition has such and
such a sense, This proposition presents such and such a situation.
\end{tlpquote}
In addition, A propositional sign is a fact, some determinate way in which its
constituent parts are connected. Such a fact, however, is not a picture
until it is used to project a possible state of things. Projecting
is the same as presenting.
\begin{tlpquote}
\item [{4.022}] The proposition \emph{shows} its sense.
The proposition shows how things stand, if it is true. And it says,
that they do so stand.
\end{tlpquote}
In my view these remarks don't, in the end, point to a single notion
of proposition. However, they do yield two closely connected and mutually
consistent notions.
\begin{quote}A propositional sign is a fact, some determinate way in which its
constituent parts are connected. Such a fact, however, is not a picture
until it is used to project a possible state of things. Projecting
is the same as presenting.\end{quote}
\noindent First, it involves taking the sign-fact to be the realization of a
possible way in which the constituents of the fact are connected---the
realization of logical form---that is also a possible way in which
objects can be connected. This factor is what the ``logical part
of the symbol'' or the ``form of a proposition'' from the \emph{NB}
theory becomes when form is reconceived as possibility of structure.
From this factor we also can see what it means for a picture to ``contain
a possibility'': a (fact used as a) picture is (a fact treated as)
the realization of a possibility.
\end{document}

afteris inserted at the end of the last item (tryafter=xxx), so it has likebeforea "backward" effect. But it is unnecessary as the grouping ends the singlespacing anyway. – Ulrike Fischer Nov 18 '15 at 10:11