With forest, you can do something like this, but note that the root of the tree is now C. If the image in the question is a genuine tree, this must be the case because a child must have exactly one parent. If that's not the case, then it is a graph but it is not of the specific graph species tree. In that case, forest may not be the best option since it is dedicated specifically to the drawing of trees.
\documentclass[tikz,multi,border=5pt]{standalone}
\usepackage{forest}
\useforestlibrary{edges}
\begin{document}
\forestapplylibrarydefaults{edges}
\begin{forest}
forked edges,
for tree={
grow'=north,
}
[C[A][B]]
\end{forest}
\end{document}

You can also use the trees TikZ library, although the syntax for specifying trees is considerably more verbose in that case.
forestpackage – percusse Feb 15 '16 at 12:56|-|because it doesn't make sense. How would TikZ know how much vertical distance to do before the horizontal bit and how much after?|-and-|make sense because they say do all of the vertical then all of the horizontal or vice-versa. – cfr Feb 15 '16 at 22:59