In answering this question, I recommended some changes to the OP and provided the following code:
\documentclass[12pt]{article}
\pagestyle{plain}
\usepackage[margin=1.8cm]{geometry}
\geometry{a4paper}
\usepackage[parfill]{parskip}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\begin{document}
\[
\begin{aligned}
|f_{n}&(x)g_{n}(x) - f_{n}(x)g(x) + f_{n}(x)g(x) - f(x)g(x)| \\
&\leq |f_{n}(x)g_{n}(x) - f_{n}(x)g(x)| + |f_{n}(x)g(x) -
f(x)g(x)| \\
&= |f_{n}(x)||g_{n}(x) - g(x)| + |g(x)||f_{n}(x) - f(x)| \\
&\leq M_{1}\epsilon + M_{2}\epsilon \\
&= \epsilon(M_1+M_2) \longrightarrow 0 \text{ as } n \to \infty
\end{aligned}
\]
\end{document}
Which produces
What I really wanted to do, though, is follow the advice of 3.3.5c of Mathematics Into Type, which recommends breaking at conjunctions and aligning with two-em quad from the left.
That I think is possibly open to interpretation, but what I would like is to have:
|f_{n}&(x)g_{n}(x) - f_{n}(x)g(x) + f_{n}(x)g(x) - f(x)g(x)|
On one line, a line break and all subsequent lines indented by a two-em quad and aligned. In other words, I want what I have, but with a precisely two-em quad indentation:
Unfortunately, the above is the closest I've been able to come. I tried:
\begin{align*}
|f_{n}(x)g_{n}(x) - f_{n}(x)g(x) + f_{n}(x)g(x) - f(x)g(x)| \\
\qquad &\leq |f_{n}(x)g_{n}(x) - f_{n}(x)g(x)| + |f_{n}(x)g(x) -
f(x)g(x)| \\
&= |f_{n}(x)||g_{n}(x) - g(x)| + |g(x)||f_{n}(x) - f(x)| \\
&\leq M_{1}\epsilon + M_{2}\epsilon \\
&= \epsilon(M_1+M_2) \longrightarrow 0 \text{ as } n \to \infty
\end{align*}
But that doesn't work at all:






(x)? – Sigur Feb 18 '16 at 01:14(x)but what I'm aiming for is precisely two-em quad from the leftmost end of the equation. This was just an example. It looks alright this time, but in the next inequality, I may not be able to find a good spot to align and it may not be in the same place. I'm after a way to make the indentation two-em quad every time. – Au101 Feb 18 '16 at 01:19\MoveEqLeftwas added tomathtoolsas described below. I got a version of the image from Mathematics into type published by the AMS. – daleif Feb 18 '16 at 12:02