I am using biblatex with biber option. Is there a way to use the ieee style with citation being number in brackets, ordered by order of appearance but to have the references displayed with \printbibliography ordered alphabetically (e.g., by author name).
It would mean that in the section reference, entries are not sorted according to their citation number but according to another criterion.
The following MWE I would like the number in Alphabetic to be [3] [2] [1] so that each reference has only one number. E.g., currently the Candy Reference gets number [1] by order of appearance but then gets number [3] in Alphabetical order.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[backend=biber,style=ieee]{biblatex}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{biblatex-ieee.bib}
@book{IEEEexample:bookwitheditor,
editor = "J. C. Candy and G. C. Temes",
title = "Oversampling Delta-Sigma Data Converters Theory,
Design and Simulation",
publisher = "{IEEE} Press.",
location = "New York",
year = "1992"
}
@inbook{IEEEexample:incollectionwithseries,
author = "J. B. Anderson and K. Tepe",
title = "Properties of the Tailbiting {BCJR} Decoder",
booktitle = "Codes, Systems and Graphical Models",
series = "{IMA} Volumes in Mathematics and Its Applications",
publisher = "Springer-Verlag",
location = "New York",
year = "2000"
}
@book{IEEEexample:inbookpagesnote,
author = "B. K. Bul",
title = "Theory Principles and Design of Magnetic Circuits",
publisher = "Energia Press",
loction = "Moscow",
year = "1964",
pages = "464",
note = "(in Russian)"
}
\end{filecontents*}
\addbibresource{biblatex-ieee.bib}
\begin{document}
\cite{IEEEexample:bookwitheditor}\cite{IEEEexample:inbookpagesnote}\cite{IEEEexample:incollectionwithseries}
\printbibliography[title=Unsorted]
\newrefcontext[sorting=nty]
\printbibliography[title=Alphabetic]
\end{document}

sorting=noneas the global sorting option and then\newrefcontext[sorting=nyt]before your\printbibliographyto sort the references by, for example, thenytsorting scheme. – PLK May 04 '16 at 11:29Candywith the same number in both lists since the numbers are sequential and the sorting is different. It would be a strange reference list with the numbers in a random order. – PLK May 05 '16 at 00:17[1]refers to Candy but not in the reference section... That ends up being quite confusing. And with thebackrefoption, it would not be too problematic to have numbers in the Reference section not in the sequential order. I will use another style, but I like theieee numericone. – Gab May 06 '16 at 09:28