Is an empty item a problem in LaTeX eqnarray?

Question

The following LaTeX code looks pretty straightforward to me:

\begin{eqnarray*}
& \lambda_l \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r} & = & \lambda_r \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r} \nonumber \\
\therefore & \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r} & = & 0 \nonumber
\end{eqnarray*}

but it results in the error:

! Missing $ inserted.
<inserted text> 
                $
l.78 ..._l \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r} & = & \lambda
                                                  _r \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{...

If I remove enough ampersands, I get a clean execution, but then I lose the alignment I am trying to get.

Is there a problem with the implicit first empty item on the first line, or is it caused by something else?

There can be at most two & per line. On the other hand, eqnarray is not the right tool for the job. — egreg, Apr 11 '17 at 14:38
@egreg Well, that clears things up. I am looking at my LaTeX manual right now where eqnarray is discussed and I notice for the first time that all the examples have only two ampersands. But I can't see anywhere where it is explicitly stated that this is the limit. Could you tell me where this is documented? Thanks! — bob.sacamento, Apr 11 '17 at 14:42
You shouldn't be using eqnarray to begin with: it's broken; see eqnarray vs align — egreg, Apr 11 '17 at 14:44
@egreg -- as much as i don't like eqnarray, i never thought of it as "broken" to the extent that it would produce such a misleading error message. now i agree -- it's definitely broken! — barbara beeton, Apr 11 '17 at 17:49

score 7 · Accepted Answer · edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:35

The eqnarray environment allows at most two & per row.

On the other hand it is broken and should not be used, see eqnarray vs align

Here are two realizations with amsmath environments. My favorite is the latter.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath,mathtools}
\usepackage{amssymb}

\usepackage{lipsum} % just for the example

\begin{document}

\lipsum*[3]
\begin{alignat*}{2}
&            &\quad \lambda_l \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r}  & = \lambda_r \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r}\\
& \therefore &\quad \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r}            & = 0
\end{alignat*}
\lipsum*[4]
\begin{align*}
\lambda_l \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r}  & = \lambda_r \mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r}\\
\shortintertext{therefore}
\mathbf{l}\cdot\mathbf{r}            & = 0
\end{align*}

\end{document}

Is an empty item a problem in LaTeX eqnarray?

1 Answers1