I am trying to align the table footnote with the table. But, I am not successful. The following is my code. I also attached the captured file. Can somebody help me to figure out this?
\begin{table}
\caption{Unconditional moments of consumption and assets} \label{Tab2}
\vspace{0.3in}
\begin{spacing}{0.8}
{\footnotesize Table 2 presents the annualized consumption and asset moments for different models with different settings. Target values for the consumption and asset moments are obtained by the U.S. data from 1960 to 2015. To estimate the model-implied the consumption and asset moments, 1,000 sample paths of the model are simulated. Each path consists of 600 monthly frequency. The mean value of each moment is calculated across time and paths. Model 1 is the simplest representative agent model without labor income. Model 2 is the representative agent model with labor income. Model 3 is the homogeneous multiple agents model with labor income. Model 4 is the heterogeneous agents model with labor income but without short-selling constraint. Finally, the base model mainly analyzed in this paper is the heterogeneous agents with labor income and short-selling constraint.}
\end{spacing}
\vspace{0.3in}
\begin{threeparttable}
\resizebox{6.5in}{!}{
\begin{tabular}{lcccccccc}
\T \B Input/Moment & & & U.S. data & \multicolumn{5}{c}{Model} \\
\cline{5-9}
\T \B & & & & Model 1 & Model 2 & Model 3 & Model 4 & Base \\ \cline{1-9} \\ [-1.5ex]
\multicolumn{9}{l}{\textbf{Panel A: Model input and specification}} \\
\T $\#$ of agents $N$ & & & & 1 & 1 & 50 & 50 & 50 \\
$[\gamma_1, \ \gamma_N]$ & & & & 20.5\tnote{1} & 20.5 & 20.5 & [1, 40] & [1, 40] \\
Labor income & & & & No & Yes & Yes & Yes & Yes \\
\B Constraint & & & & No & No & No & No & Yes \\
\\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{\textbf{Panel B: Consumption moments}} \\
\T Aggregate consumption growth mean & & & 0.0180 & 0.05 & 0.0137 & 0.0137 & 0.0138 & 0.0138 \\
\B Aggregate consumption growth st. dev. & & & 0.0137 & 0.09 & 0.0305 & 0.0305 & 0.0307 & 0.0307 \\ \\
\multicolumn{9}{l}{\textbf{Panel C: Asset returns moments}} \\
\T Equity excess return mean & & & 0.0617 & 0.1661\tnote{2} & 0.05 & 0.0471 & 0.0245 & 0.0235 \\
Equity excess return st. dev. & & & 0.1525 & 0.0900 & 0.2516 & 0.2371 & 0.2246 & 0.2196 \\
Sharpe ratio & & & 0.4048 & 1.8450 & 0.1986 & 0.1986 & 0.1090 & 0.1071 \\
Risk-free rate mean & & & 0.0145 & -0.6600 & 0.3607 & 0.3607 & 0.2304 & 0.2312 \\
Risk-free rate st. dev. & & & 0.0266 & 0 & 0.0009 & 0.0008 & 0.0011 & 0.0012 \\
\B $Corr(dR_t,\frac{d\sum_{i=1}^{N}C_{i,t}^*}{\sum_{i=1}^{N}C_{i,t}^*})$ & & & 0.1921 & 1 & 0.0502 & 0.0473 & 0.0481 & 0.0473 \\ \hline
\end{tabular}%
}
\begin{tablenotes}
\footnotesize
\item[1] 20.5 is chosen as the average of [1,40]
\item[2] If the moments of aggregate consumption growth (0.018, 0.0137) are used, the asset moments from excess returns mean to risk-free rate mean are 0.0039, 0.0137, 0.2817, and 0.4271, respectively.
\end{tablenotes}
\end{threeparttable}
\end{table}
\clearpage


\Band\Tin your code. – Alan Munn May 28 '17 at 00:12\resizeboxcommand. This is something you shouldn't do. Instead make your first column a fixed width column to reduce the width of your whole table. You might also want to use thebooktabspackage to make the table cleaner. – Alan Munn May 28 '17 at 00:28\documentclassto\end{document}– Biki Teron May 28 '17 at 00:47