Why does mhchem complain about this?

Question

Alright, I'm trying to make a command to insert a proton. This code works fine:

\documentclass[12pt,letterpaper]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,mathtools}
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}

\newcommand{\tphoton}{$\gamma$}

\begin{document}
\tphoton
\end{document}

and this code works fine:

\documentclass[12pt,letterpaper]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,mathtools}
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}

\begin{document}
\ce{$\gamma$}
\end{document}

Why doesn't this code work?

\documentclass[12pt,letterpaper]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,mathtools}
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}

\newcommand{\tphoton}{$\gamma$}

\begin{document}
\ce{\tphoton}
\end{document}

It gives a "! Missing $ inserted.", 3 "! Extra }, or forgotten $."

\tphoton or \tproton, you decide. But example 1 throws an error right now, too. ;-) — lockstep, Jan 15 '12 at 21:32
@lockstep Fixed: I pasted an old testcase in by accident.I switched to \tphoton since it was more minimal. — Canageek, Jan 15 '12 at 21:34

score 7 · Accepted Answer · answered Jan 15 '12 at 21:36

7

The argument of mhchem's \ce already is a "hidden math mode". \ce{\bfseries B} will give

! LaTeX Error: Command \bfseries invalid in math mode.

Try \ensuremath instead:

\documentclass[12pt,letterpaper]{article}
\usepackage{amssymb,mathtools}
\usepackage[version=3]{mhchem}

\newcommand{\tphoton}{\ensuremath{\gamma}}

\begin{document}
\ce{\tphoton}
\end{document}

answered Jan 15 '12 at 21:36

cgnieder

66,645

Why does \ce{$\gamma$} work then? (my guess is that it becomes ...$$\gamma$$..., which is also valid). – Bruno Le Floch Jan 15 '12 at 21:43
I guess that the \ce gobbles the $. \ce{$\gamma$}, \ce{$$\gamma$$} and even \ce{$$$\gamma$$$} work fine. – cgnieder Jan 15 '12 at 21:46

Why does mhchem complain about this?

1 Answers1

Linked