Biblatex doesn't show the same source on successive citations. I tried it with dashed=false, but it doesn't work. How can I make that the work is always fully cited, even on subsequent citations?
\RequirePackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents*}{\jobname.bib}
@interview{homer,
interviewee = {Homer Simpson},
interviewer = {Bart Simpson},
date = {2018-07-25},
address = {Springfield},
}
\end{filecontents*}
\begin{filecontents}{interview.dbx}
\DeclareDatamodelEntrytypes{interview}
\DeclareDatamodelFields[type=list,datatype=name]{
interviewer,
interviewee,
}
\DeclareDatamodelEntryfields[interview]{
addendum,
doi,
eprint,
eprintclass,
eprinttype,
interviewer,
interviewee,
location,
note,
pubstate,
}
\end{filecontents}
\documentclass[ngerman]{article}
\usepackage{babel}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\usepackage[datamodel=interview,backend=biber, dashed=false, style=authortitle, citestyle=verbose,]{biblatex}
\usepackage{hyperref}
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}
\NewBibliographyString{interview}
\DefineBibliographyStrings{german}{%
interview = {Interview},
}
\DeclareNameAlias{interviewee}{author}
\DeclareBibliographyDriver{interview}{%
\usebibmacro{bibindex}%
\usebibmacro{begentry}%
\printnames{interviewee}%
\newunit\newblock
\bibstring{interview}%
\setunit{\addspace}%
\printnames{interviewer}%
\newunit\newblock
\printfield{note}%
\newunit\newblock
\usebibmacro{location+date}%
\newunit\newblock
\usebibmacro{doi+eprint+url}%
\newunit\newblock
\usebibmacro{addendum+pubstate}%
\setunit{\bibpagerefpunct}\newblock
\usebibmacro{pageref}%
\newunit\newblock
\iftoggle{bbx:related}
{\usebibmacro{related:init}%
\usebibmacro{related}}
{}%
\usebibmacro{finentry}}
\begin{document}
\footcite{homer}
\footcite{homer}
\printbibliography
\end{document}

dashed=falsewon't help there at all. What output would you expect? – moewe Dec 13 '18 at 19:12style=authortitle, citestyle=verbose,should be the same asstyle=verbose,. Usually the subsequent citation is a shorter form with only author and title. Do you still want the full citation on subsequent cites in this case? – moewe Dec 13 '18 at 19:29