The cross-referencing commands of the cleveref package -- specifically, \cref and \crefrange -- may be your friend. Note that in the solution shown below, there are no parentheses around the cross-referenced items. I don't believe that these parentheses are either necessary or helpful.

The \crefrange command, which takes two arguments, is designed for cross-references to a contiguous range of items. The \cref command takes one argument, a comma-separated list of labels. The \cref command automatically sorts the contents of its argument; it's not necessary to enter them in ascending order.
Optionally, you could load the hyperref package. Doing so will make the cross-references generated by \cref and \crefrange into hyperlinks to the associated "targets". If you load the hyperref package, be sure to load it immediately before cleveref. Basically, hyperref and cleveref should be the last two packages loaded in the preamble.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
\usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref} % optional
\prepackage{cleveref}
\crefname{enumi}{example}{examples}
\newcommand{\crefrangeconjunction}{--}
\newcommand{\creflastconjunction}{, and } % optional, for "Oxford comma"
\begin{document}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \begin{enumerate*} % inline list saves space
\item One \label{ex1} \item Two \label{ex2} \item Three \label{ex3}
\item Four \label{ex4} \item Five \label{ex5} \item Six \label{ex6}
\item Seven \label{ex7} \item Eight \label{ex8} \item Nine \label{ex9}
\end{enumerate*}
\end{enumerate}
We can see in \crefrange{ex1}{ex5} that \dots
We can see in \cref{ex9,ex3,ex7,ex5,ex6,ex1,ex2} that \dots
\end{document}
Addendum: The cleveref package provides some very powerful utility macros. For instance, as explained in section of package's user guide, one can strip the common prefix -- here, "1" -- from ranges of cross-references.

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
\usepackage[colorlinks]{hyperref}
\usepackage{cleveref}
\crefname{enumi}{example}{examples}
%\newcommand{\crefrangeconjunction}{--}
\newcommand{\creflastconjunction}{, and } % optional, for "Oxford comma"
\crefrangelabelformat{enumi}{#3#1#4--#5\crefstripprefix{#1}{#2}#6}
\begin{document}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \begin{enumerate*} % inline list saves space
\item One \label{ex1} \item Two \label{ex2} \item Three \label{ex3}
\item Four \label{ex4} \item Five \label{ex5} \item Six \label{ex6}
\item Seven \label{ex7} \item Eight \label{ex8} \item Nine \label{ex9}
\end{enumerate*}
\end{enumerate}
We can see in \crefrange{ex1}{ex5} that \dots
We can see in \cref{ex9,ex3,ex7,ex5,ex6,ex1,ex2} that \dots
\end{document}
(1a-c,e-f,i)or(1a-c,1e-f,1i), or(1a-c), (1e-f), (1i)or ... ? What about mixed labels like(1a-c,2e-f)...? – Dec 17 '18 at 03:151a-c, 1e-g, and 1irather than just1a-c, 1e-f, 1i? – Mico Dec 17 '18 at 05:36\ref{label}) manually. If there's an easier way to do it in a way that I have to add the parentheses manually, that's fine. And I'd like the "and" prior to the last item. But if I can find a way to call, for example,1a-c, I would be happy just repeating the command for the rest of the items, e.g. (\ref{label_a-c}, \ref{label_e-f}, \ref{label{i}) – Ernesto Dec 17 '18 at 05:53