0

With pdflatex I often used \left( and \right) to scale the parenthesis of a function as in

\[\exp\left(\frac{a}{b}\right) \]

exp(a/b)

But this method was not perfect, because

Is there a modern solution in LuaLaTeX for this? Is there a reason why we do not write 

\exp[bigg]{ \frac{a}{b} }

and define a good function with parenthesis? This could be done for example with DeclarePairedDelimiter from mathtools.

Jonas Stein
  • 8,909
  • 1
    I have thought about it many times, how to improve the TeX math syntax, but have come to the conclusion that the syntax defined by Knuth is the optimal one. There are basically no improvements possible, which is probably why everyone else uses TeX math syntax (MathJax, recent MS Office, ...). – Henri Menke Apr 25 '19 at 09:50
  • 2
    (I deleted my comment, seeing that you amended the question.) The problem with your suggestion, I think, is that it forces all usages of \exp to use round parentheses. In the real world, that seems to be too restrictive. There is nothing stopping you from creating your own command for the exponential and other functions, though. – Harald Hanche-Olsen Apr 25 '19 at 10:03
  • @HenriMenke At first, I read your comment as being in opposition to such constructs as \DeclarePairedDelimiter, but on second reading, I think you are talking about the basic syntax for math, not whatever constructs people might build on top of it for their own use. Am I correct? – Harald Hanche-Olsen Apr 25 '19 at 10:05
  • @HaraldHanche-Olsen Sort of. I usually declare \abs for \lvert...\rvert in my documents, but the answer with \mexp I already find too much. I doubt that it will add a lot in terms of efficiency in the long run. – Henri Menke Apr 25 '19 at 10:36
  • 1
    @HenriMenke Indeed. I often use \DeclarePairedDelimiter\parens() and similar for other delimiters, though, not because it saves typing (it doesn't), but because it is easier to adjust the sizing of the parentheses in one place rather than two. And for curly braces it is useful because my editor will not match \{ and \} the way it does ordinary delimiters. – Harald Hanche-Olsen Apr 25 '19 at 12:11

1 Answers1

3

You should not be afraid of mathtools. Note that I explicitly give it a different name, so we can use \exp internally.

But I agree with Henri and Haralds comments.

\documentclass[a4paper]{memoir}

\usepackage{mathtools}
\DeclarePairedDelimiterXPP\mexp[1]{\exp}{(}{)}{}{#1}
\begin{document}

\[
  \mexp*{\frac{a}{b}}
\]

\end{document}

A lot of the macros I use are specifically made to hide certain typographical aspects of math typesetting, such that they do not disturb the code.

For example

\[
   f(x) > 0 \qquad\text{for all $x>0$}
\]

vs

\[
 f(x) >0 \For{for all $x>0$}
\]

Here \qquad\text, to me, is typographical noise.

daleif
  • 54,450