I'm working with an amsbook document, and I want to use the ntheorem package. This is unsurprisingly causing a complaint with the amsthm package implicitly loaded for the amsbook documentclass. There's no clear superior choice between amsthm and ntheorem, each has its plusses and minuses. So it seemed the best option to use
\usepackage[amsthm]{ntheorem}
which gives an approximation of the best of both worlds (section 3.2.2). But that only works if you can remove the amsthm package. How do I achieve this result with the amsbook document class?
This code below exhibits alternately a minimal working and broken example:
\documentclass{article}%{amsbook}
\usepackage[amsthm]{ntheorem}
\begin{document}
Test
\end{document}
One answer provided implicitly here was that they just don't blend but I want to believe that it can be done.
EDIT: @david-carlisle and @barbara-beeton correct my misapprehension; apparently it is not the amsthm package included in amsbook, but instead that the amsbook class contains code equivalent to that provided in the amsthm class.
amsthmincorporated intoamsbook, it's not identical to the standaloneamsthm. All AMS document classes andamsthmare generated fromamsclass.dtx, so the differences can be determined there. (All in TeX Live.) – barbara beeton Jul 11 '19 at 21:06