So this might be a bit specific of a question, but I need BibLaTeX to output dates in the long DMY format - dd.mm.yyyy that is.
BibLaTeX documentation states that one can achieve dd/mm/yyyy by using the date = terse setting.
However, I'd like to have the date separator to be a dot instead of a slash. I didn't find any easy way to do this while browsing through the documentation.
Here's an MWE (and its output) on what I'm working on, roughly. I have been modifying the style = chem-rsc package to fit my needs (or rather my Uni's requirements), but I've omitted those changes here for they are irrevelent in this case.
\documentclass[a4paper,12pt,british]{article}
\usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
\usepackage[labelfont=bf]{caption}
\usepackage[british]{babel}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\usepackage{csquotes}
\usepackage[backend=biber,
style = chem-rsc,
autocite = superscript,
autopunct = true,
sorting = none,
sortcites = true,
eventdate = terse,
datezeros = true,]{biblatex}
\begin{filecontents}{viitteet.bib}
@inproceedings{othusitse2015,
author = {Nhlanhla Othusitse and Edison Muzenda},
title = {Predictive Models of Leaching Processes: A Critical Review},
booktitle = {7th Int. Conf. on Latest Trends in Engineering \& Technology},
location = {Irene, Pretoria, South Africa},
eventdate = {2015-11-26/2015-11-27},
pages = {136--141},
}
\end{filecontents}
\addbibresource{viitteet.bib}
\begin{document}
\section{Section}
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.\supercite{othusitse2015}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
EDIT:
I tried tinkering with something like this...
\DefineBibliographyExtras{british}{%
\renewrobustcmd*{\bibdatesep}{\adperiod}
}
... but to no avail.


\usepackage{biblatex}without changing the defaults, do you get the right separator in that case? Obviously not a solution, but it will tell you if the problem is in the\DefineBibliographyExtrasor something the style/options are doing. If it works with the default, experiment to isolate the option causing the issue. (Probably the style, but worth checking.) – cfr Oct 27 '19 at 17:55