Matrix is not completely fitted in the PDF generated from LaTex

Question

I have the following LaTex code for a 10x10 matrix (which I have imported from Mathematica),

"$$\begin{bmatrix*}[r]
 -2 (\text{$\beta $111} +\text{$\beta $224} x^2 & 0
   & 2 \text{$\alpha $111} & 2 \text{$\alpha $223} y^2 & 2 \text{$\alpha $224} x^2 &
   0 & 0 & 0 & x y (\text{$\alpha $223}+\text{$\alpha $224}) & x y (\text{$\alpha
   $223}+\text{$\alpha $224}) \\
   +\text{$\beta $223} y^2)&&&&&&&&& \\
 0 & -2 (\text{$\beta $222}+\text{$\beta $115} x^2
   & 0 & 2 \text{$\alpha $115} x^2 & 2 \text{$\alpha $116} y^2 & 2 \text{$\alpha
   $222} & 0 & 0 & -x y (\text{$\alpha $115}+\text{$\alpha $116}) & -x y
   (\text{$\alpha $115}+\text{$\alpha $116}) \\
   &+\text{$\beta $116} y^2)&&&&&&&& \\
 2 \text{$\beta $111} & 0 & -2 (\text{$\alpha $111}+\text{$\beta $222}) & 0 & 0 & 0 &
   2 \text{$\alpha $222} & 0 & 0 & 0 \\
 2 \text{$\beta $223} y^2 & 2 \text{$\beta $115} x^2 & 0 & -2 (\text{$\alpha
   $115} x^2+\text{$\beta $229} x^2 & 0 & 0 & 2 \text{$\alpha $117} y^2 & 2 \text{$\alpha $229} x^2 & -x y
   (-\text{$\alpha $116}+\text{$\alpha $224}
   & -x y (-\text{$\alpha $116}+\text{$\alpha $224} \\
    &&&+\text{$\alpha $223} y^2+\text{$\beta $117}
   y^2)&&&&&+\text{$\beta $118}-\text{$\beta $2210})&+\text{$\beta $118}-\text{$\beta
   $2210})
   \\
 2 \text{$\beta $224} x^2 & 2 \text{$\beta $116} y^2 & 0 & 0 & -2 (\text{$\alpha
   $224} x^2+\text{$\beta $118} x^2 & 0 & 2 \text{$\alpha $118} x^2 & 2 \text{$\alpha $2210} y^2 & -x y
   (-\text{$\alpha $115}+\text{$\alpha $223} &
   -x y (-\text{$\alpha $115}+\text{$\alpha $223} \\
    &&&&+\text{$\alpha $116} y^2+\text{$\beta $2210}
   y^2)&&&&+\text{$\beta $117}-\text{$\beta $229})&+\text{$\beta $117}-\text{$\beta
   $229})
   \\
 0 & 2 \text{$\beta $222} & 0 & 0 & 0 & -2 (\text{$\alpha $222}+\text{$\beta $111}) &
   0 & 2 \text{$\alpha $111} & 0 & 0 \\
 0 & 0 & 2 \text{$\beta $222} & 2 \text{$\beta $117} y^2 & 2 \text{$\beta $118} x^2 &
   0 & -2 (\text{$\alpha $222}+\text{$\alpha $117} x^2 & 0 & x y (\text{$\beta $117}+\text{$\beta $118}) & x y (\text{$\beta
   $117}+\text{$\beta $118}) \\
   &&&&&&+\text{$\alpha $118}
   y^2)&&&\\
0 & 0 & 0 & 2 \text{$\beta $229} x^2 & 2 \text{$\beta $2210} y^2 & 2 \text{$\beta
   $111} & 0 & -2 (\text{$\alpha $111}+\text{$\alpha $2210} x^2& -x y (\text{$\beta $2210}+\text{$\beta $229}) & -x y
   (\text{$\beta $2210}+\text{$\beta $229})\\
   &&&&&&&+\text{$\alpha
   $229} y^2) && \\
 x y (\text{$\beta $223}+\text{$\beta $224}) & -x y (\text{$\beta $115}+\text{$\beta
   $116}) & 0 & x y (\text{$\alpha $118}-\text{$\alpha $2210} & x y (\text{$\alpha $117}-\text{$\alpha
   $229} & 0 & x y (\text{$\alpha
   $117}+\text{$\alpha $118}) & -x y (\text{$\alpha $2210}+\text{$\alpha $229}) & -i
   (\text{l1}-\text{l2}) & 0 \\
   &&&-\text{$\beta
   $116}+\text{$\beta $224})&-\text{$\beta $115}+\text{$\beta $223})&&&&-\text{$\alpha $115} x^2-\text{$\alpha $224} x^2&
   \\
   &&&&&&&&-\text{$\beta
   $118} x^2-\text{$\beta $229} x^2&
   \\
   &&&&&&&&-\text{$\alpha $116} y^2-\text{$\alpha $223}
   y^2&
   \\
   &&&&&&&&-\text{$\beta $117} y^2-\text{$\beta $2210} y^2&
   \\
 x y (\text{$\beta $223}+\text{$\beta $224}) & -x y (\text{$\beta $115}+\text{$\beta
   $116}) & 0 & x y (\text{$\alpha $118}-\text{$\alpha $2210} & x y (\text{$\alpha $117}-\text{$\alpha
   $229} & 0 & x y (\text{$\alpha
   $117}+\text{$\alpha $118}) & -x y (\text{$\alpha $2210}+\text{$\alpha $229}) & 0 &
   -i (\text{l2}-\text{l1})
   \\
   &&&-\text{$\beta
   $116}+\text{$\beta $224})&-\text{$\beta $115}+\text{$\beta $223})&&&&&-\text{$\alpha $115} x^2-\text{$\alpha $224}x^2
   \\
   &&&&&&&&&-\text{$\beta
   $118} x^2-\text{$\beta $229} x^2
   \\
   &&&&&&&&&-\text{$\alpha $116} y^2-\text{$\alpha $223}
   y^2
   \\
     &&&&&&&&&-\text{$\beta $117} y^2-\text{$\beta $2210} y^2 \\
\end{bmatrix*} $$
\end{document}

complete matrix is fitted in the PDF for the following latex format,

\documentclass{standalone}
\usepackage{amsmath,mathtools,amsthm}
\usepackage{array}

have also attached the complete matrix in this format.

But for the format ,

\usepackage{setspace}
\usepackage{amssymb}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{graphicx}
\usepackage{siunitx}
\usepackage{geometry,mathtools}
\usepackage{comment}
\setcounter{MaxMatrixCols}{10}
\usepackage[a4paper,margin=1.5cm]{geometry}"

I was getting up to column six for the following document type,

So, is there any way to fit the complete matrix in this format?

Welcome to TSE. Please post a minimal working example, instead of a code snippet. — José Carlos Santos, Dec 16 '19 at 10:28
why on earch is mathematica using \text{$...$} on each value? — daleif, Dec 16 '19 at 10:44
There is no way that is ever going to fit on a single page. I managed to get it to fit in landscape if I scaled it down to approx 1.7pt font size. In comparison the latex detail is 10pt, so the end result is not readable. — daleif, Dec 16 '19 at 10:57
The number after \alpha and \beta are subscripts? If so you can gain some space. — vi pa, Dec 16 '19 at 11:16
We need to know the layout of your page. SO please provide complete small document (MWE) . — Zarko, Dec 16 '19 at 11:51
Thank you all for your help. I have reduced my matrix size by using few trick but still its not fitted in the PDF completely. — Souvik, Dec 17 '19 at 06:37
You should provide MWE (Minimal Working Example, small complete/compilable document, which reproduce your problem), not only code fragments. Showed image of your matrix is not produced with your code (it is erroneous). Let me repeat @daleif comment: your matrix, as is written, can not be fit on one page. See, if (my answer) on the question https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/257313/shrinking-or-splitting-some-equations-in-a-group-of-equations can help you, i.e. is acceptable to you. — Zarko, Dec 17 '19 at 07:43

score 1 · Answer 1 · answered Dec 17 '19 at 14:02

Your matrix is realy huge and as it is writen, can not be fit on one page. Possible solution can be is splitting it onto two parts:

This solution is based on assumption that number at \alpha and \beta are their indices. If this is case, please let us know.

After removing all clutter from your code, the MWE is:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[a4paper, margin=15mm]{geometry}
\usepackage{nccmath, mathtools}

\begin{document}
\begingroup
\setlength\arraycolsep{1pt}
\renewcommand\arraystretch{1.5}
\begin{multline}
\medmath{
\widehat{\widetilde{\mathcal{M}}} =
   \left[\begin{array}{*{5}{c}}
\begin{multlined}[t]-2 \bigl(\beta_{111}+\\[-2.4ex]
\beta_{224} x^2+\beta_{223} y^2\bigr)\end{multlined}
    & 0
        & 2 \alpha_{111}
            & 2 \alpha_{223} y^2
                & 2 \alpha_{224} x^2    \\%%%%
0
    & \begin{multlined}[t]-2 \bigl(\beta_{222}+\\[-2.4ex]
    \beta_{115} x^2+\beta_{116} y^2\bigr)\end{multlined}
        & 0
            & 2 \alpha_{115} x^2
                & 2 \alpha_{116} y^2    \\%%%%
 \beta_{111}
    & 0
        & -2 \bigl(\alpha_{111}+\beta_{222}\bigr)
            & 0
                & 0    \\%%%%
2 \beta_{223} y^2
    & 2 \beta_{115} x^2
        & 0
            & \begin{multlined}[t]-2 \bigl(\alpha_{115} x^2+ \beta_{229} x^2+ \\[-2.4ex]
            \alpha_{223} y^2 + \beta_{117} y^2\bigr)\end{multlined}
                & 0    \\%%%%
2 \beta_{224} x^2
    & 2 \beta_{116} y^2
        & 0
            & 0
                & \begin{multlined}[t]-2 \bigl(\alpha_{224} x^2+\beta_{118} x^2 +\\[-2.4ex]
                \alpha_{116} y^2 +\beta_{2210}y^2\bigr)\end{multlined}    \\%%%%
0
    & 2 \beta_{222}
        & 0
            & 0
                & 0    \\%%%%
0
    & 0
        & 2 \beta_{222}
            & 2 \beta_{117} y^2
                & 2 \beta_{118} x^2    \\%%%%
0
    & 0
        & 0
            & 2 \beta_{229} x^2
                & 2 \beta_{2210} y^2    \\%%%%
x y \bigl(\beta_{223}+\beta_{224}\bigr)
    & -x y (\beta_{115}+\beta_{116}\bigr)
        & 0
            & \begin{multlined}[t]x y \bigl(\alpha_{118}-\alpha_{2210}-\\[-2.4ex]
            \beta_{116}+\beta_{224}\bigr)\end{multlined}
                & \begin{multlined}[t]x y \bigl(\alpha_{117}-\alpha_{229}-\\[-2.4ex]
                \beta_{115}+\beta_{223}\bigr)\end{multlined}    \\%%%%
x y \bigl(\beta_{223}+\beta_{224}\bigr)
    & -x y \bigl(\beta_{115}+\beta_{116}\bigr)
        & 0
            & \begin{multlined}[t]v y \bigl(\alpha_{118}-\alpha_{2210}-\\[-2.4ex]
            \beta_{116}+\beta_{224}\bigr)\end{multlined}
                & \begin{multlined}[t]x y\bigl(\alpha_{117}-\alpha_{229}-\\[-1ex]
                \beta_{115}+\beta_{223}\bigr)\end{multlined}
    \end{array}\right.}   \\
%%%%%%%%%%%%%% SECOND PART
    \medmath{
    \left.\begin{array}{*{5}{c}}
0
    & 0
        & 0
            & x y \bigl(\alpha_{223}+\alpha_{224}\bigr)
                & x y \bigl(\alpha_{223}+\alpha_{224}\bigr) \\
2 \alpha_{222}
    & 0
        & 0
            & -x y \bigl(\alpha_{115}+\alpha_{116}\bigr)
                & -x y \bigl(\alpha_{115}+\alpha_{116}\bigr) \\
0
    & 2 \alpha_{222}
        & 0
            & 0
                & 0 \\
0
    & 2 \alpha_{117} y^2
        & 2 \alpha_{229} x^2
            & \begin{multlined}[t]
            -x y \bigl(-\alpha_{116}+\alpha_{224}+\\[-2.4ex]
            \beta_{118}-\beta_{2210}\bigr)\end{multlined}
                & \begin{multlined}[t]-x\bigl(-\alpha_{116}+\alpha_{224}+\\[-2.4ex]
                \beta_{118}-\beta_{2210}\bigr)\end{multlined} \\                
0
    & \begin{multlined}[t]
    -2 \bigl(\alpha_{222}+\\[-2.4ex]
    \alpha_{117} x^2+\alpha_{118} y^2\bigr)\end{multlined}
        & 0
            & x y (\beta_{117}+\beta_{118}\bigr)
                & x y \bigl(\beta_{117}+\beta_{118}\bigr) \\
0
    & 2 \alpha_{118} x^2
        & 2 \alpha_{2210} y^2
            & \begin{multlined}[t]
            -x y\bigl(-\alpha_{115}+\alpha_{223}+\\[-2.4ex]
            \beta_{117}-\beta_{229}\bigr)\end{multlined}
                & \begin{multlined}[t]
                -x y \bigl(-\alpha_{115}+\alpha_{223}+\\[-2.4ex] \beta_{117}-\beta_{229}\bigr)\end{multlined} \\
-2 \bigl(\alpha_{222}+\beta_{111}\bigr)
    & 0
        & 2 \alpha_{111}
            & 0
                & 0 \\
0
    & \begin{multlined}[t]-2 \bigl(\alpha_{222}+\\[-2.4ex]
    \alpha_{117} x^2+\alpha_{118} y^2\bigr)\end{multlined}
        & 0
            & x y (\beta_{117}+\beta_{118}\bigr)
                & x y \bigl(\beta_{117}+\beta_{118}\bigr) \\
2 \beta_{111}
    & 0
        & \begin{multlined}[t]-2 \bigl(\alpha_{111}+\\[-2.4ex]
        \alpha_{2210} x^2 +\alpha_{229} y^2\bigr)\end{multlined}
            & -x y \bigl(\beta_{2210}+\beta_{229}\bigr)
                & -x y\bigl(\beta_{2210}+\beta_{229}\bigr) \\
0
    & x y \bigl(\alpha_{117}+\alpha_{118}\bigr)
        & -x y \bigl(\alpha_{2210}+\alpha_{229}\bigr)
            & \begin{multlined}[t]
            -i (l1-l2)-\alpha_{115} x^2-\\[-2.4ex]
            \alpha_{224} x^2-\beta_{118} x^2-\\
            \beta_{229}x^2-\alpha_{116} y^2-\\ 
            \alpha_{223}y^2-\beta_{117} y^2-\\
            \beta_{2210} y^2\end{multlined}
                & 0     \\
0
    & x y \bigl(\alpha_{117}+\alpha_{118}\bigr)
        & -x y \bigl(\alpha_{2210}+\alpha_{229}\bigr)
            & 0
                & \begin{multlined}[t]-i(l2-l1)-\alpha_{115}x^2-\\[-2.4ex]
                \alpha_{224}x^2-\beta_{118} x^2-\\
                \beta_{229} x^2-\alpha_{116}y^2-\\
                \alpha_{223} y^2-\beta_{117} y^2-\\
                \beta_{2210} y^2\end{multlined}
    \end{array}\right]}
\end{multline}
\endgroup
\end{document}

Matrix is not completely fitted in the PDF generated from LaTex

1 Answers1