1

The following gives a compilation error:

\documentclass{report}
\usepackage{dot2texi}
\usepackage[newfloat]{minted}
\begin{document}
Content
\end{document}

with output

...
Package: dot2texi 2008/05/07 v3.0p1 Run dot2tex from LaTeX
(/usr/local/texlive/2019/texmf-dist/tex/latex/moreverb/moreverb.sty
Package: moreverb 2008/06/03 v2.3a `more' verbatim facilities
(/usr/local/texlive/2019/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tools/verbatim.sty
Package: verbatim 2019/11/10 v1.5r LaTeX2e package for verbatim enhancements
...
Package: minted 2017/07/19 v2.5 Yet another Pygments shim for LaTeX
...
! LaTeX Error: Command \listing already defined.
               Or name \end... illegal, see p.192 of the manual.

See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
Type  H <return>  for immediate help.
 ...


l.1151 ...sting}{tbp}{lol}[\minted@float@within]}}


Your command was ignored.
Type  I <command> <return>  to replace it with another command,
or  <return>  to continue without it.

It seems that moreverb and minted are both trying to define \listing

Eric
  • 669

2 Answers2

1

Unfortunately, moreverb defines listing and listing* environments that conflict with the environment with the same names defined by minted.

You can remove the useless environments defined by moreverb.

\documentclass{report}

\usepackage{dot2texi}
% remove the definitions of listing and listing*
\newcommand\zzzzzz[1]{\expandafter\let\csname#1\endcsname\relax}
\zzzzzz{listing}\zzzzzz{endlisting}
\zzzzzz{listing}\zzzzzz{endlisting}


\usepackage[newfloat]{minted}


\begin{document}
Content
\end{document}

Note: I used a fairly large number of z's in order to make David happy.

With no z:

\documentclass{report}

\usepackage{etoolbox}


\usepackage{dot2texi}
% remove the definitions of listing and listing*
\csundef{listing}\csundef{endlisting}
\csundef{listing}\csundef{endlisting}


\usepackage[newfloat]{minted}


\begin{document}
Content
\end{document}
egreg
  • 1,121,712
  • \csundef was exactly what I was looking for - I was expecting https://tex.stackexchange.com/q/20655/41112 to mention it, but it seems not to. – Eric Aug 16 '20 at 19:14
  • Is there a reason to prefer your zzz approach instead of csundef? – Eric Aug 16 '20 at 19:14
  • @Eric The z approach would make David happy, that's the main reason. Out of joke, it doesn't require loading an additional package. – egreg Aug 16 '20 at 19:47
1

It worked for me if I changed the order of the package declarations. First, moreverb and later minted.

\usepackage{moreverb}

\usepackage{minted}
Mensch
  • 65,388
user237872
  • 11