I would like the subscript of my sum to look better:
$$
\sum_{d \mid p_j^{m_j}} f(d)
$$
creates the output
but i would like the exponent m_j to be further down and closer p_j.
I would like the subscript of my sum to look better:
$$
\sum_{d \mid p_j^{m_j}} f(d)
$$
creates the output
but i would like the exponent m_j to be further down and closer p_j.
I'd like to suggest that you \smash the subscript term j in p_j. Alternatively, you could \smash the j subscript term in m_j. Optionally, to remove any ambiguity as to where j in p_j belongs, snug it up to the p term via a \! ("negative thinspace") directive.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath} % for \smash[t] macro
\begin{document}
\[
\sum_{d \mid p_{j}^{m_j}}
\quad\mbox{vs.}\quad
\sum_{d \mid p_{\smash[t]{\!j}}^{m_j}}
\quad\mbox{vs.}\quad
\sum_{d \mid p_{\!j}^{m_{\smash{j}}}}
\]
\end{document}
You can use the commands \left and \right to force something before and after a certain text. If you just want to use something to one side, use . to avoid the unwanted side.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
\sum_{\left.{d}\right|_{p_j}^{m_j}}f(d)
\end{equation}
\end{document}
Here you go!
{p_j} should not be placed on a line below d. Your notation also fails to treat m_j as a modifier of p_j.
– Mico
Nov 21 '21 at 12:08
\[ ... \]preferable to$$ ... $$for an in-depth discussion of why one shouldn't use$$to initiate and terminate display math mode in LaTeX documents. – Mico Nov 21 '21 at 12:26