Feeding
\documentclass{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\usepackage{newtxtext}
\usepackage{hyperref}%%% it's bizarre that adding a package for referencing (and not using this package) changes the shapes of unrelated symbols
\begin{document}
\textcircled{0}\textcircled{1}
\end{document}
to [pdf]latex in TeX Live as of 2022-09-26 (not in TeX Live in Debian, version 2021.20211217-1) yields encircled digits in which the circle touches the digit:
These shapes are a no-go to us.
Notice that dropping NewTX or hyperref or both yields better encircled digits, in which the circle does NOT touch the digit:
A. Standard, i.e., without NewTX and hyperref (for our purposes tolerable shapes):
B. With NewTX only (good shapes):
C. With hyperref only (for our purposes tolerable shapes):
Why does including NewTX and hyperref together distort the symbols in such a bad way? Who is the culprit?
How to get graphically better symbols ⓪ and ① (in which the circle doesn't touch the digit, say, the symbols from item B above) if we use (for reasons not mentioned in this minimal example) [pdf]latex, NewTX, and hyperref? Naturally, we can draw a circle around the digit with picture, pstricks, or tikz or install the ancient https://ctan.org/pkg/magic , use pifont, and issue
\textsmaller[2.5]{\Pisymbol{magic}{48}}} \textsmaller[2.5]{\Pisymbol{magic}{49}}, …. However, perhaps, there might be a straightforward fix of LaTeX, NewTX, or hyperref, or one could somehow use the NewTX definitions of\textcircled{0}and\textcircled{1}after hyperref (of course, one should repair the bounding boxes somehow; cf. How to repair the bounding boxes of circled digits in standard LaTeX, hyperref, NewTX, and magic?).Let's assume that we need not only text-mode ⓪ and ① but also math-mode ⓪ and ①. Is there anything better and more direct than
\text{\textcircled{0}}\text{\textcircled{1}}?
This post is not about UTF-8 engines (with {lua|xe}latex, we get the symbols ⓪ and ① from OTF fonts) and not about encircling anything else besides 0 and 1.





\textcircled{0}…\textcircled{9}in Computer Modern are (to my taste) somewhat better than in the image your link. Namely, running pdflatex on https://pastebin.com/raw/fwY6wFz9 yields https://i.imgur.com/nDZZ14q.png : most circles don't touch the digits, whereas in the post you cite, all circles visibly touch the digits. – Sep 25 '22 at 23:18