I want to create a custom article that will list various references at the end of each section. This reference list needs to be independent of each other although some cited articles may appear in each list in different order. This a MWE of my intended document
\begin{filecontents}{refslist.bib}
@article{key,
author = {author1},
title = {title1}
}
@article{key2,
author = {author2},
title ={title2}
}
@article{key3,
author = {author3},
title ={title3}
}
@article{key4,
author ={author4},
title ={title4}
}
\end{filecontents}
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\usepackage[defernumbers=true,style=numeric,backend=bibtex,url=true,isbn=false,sorting=none,citereset=subsection]{biblatex}
\addbibresource{refslist.bib}
\begin{document}
\section{Show}
This section will show a list of cited articles \cite{key,key2,key3,key4}
\subsection{References in order 1}
\printbibliography[heading=none,section=\therefsection, title={References}]
\section{Not Show}
This section will not show a list of cited articles \cite{key2,key3,key3,key} \therefsection
\newrefsection
%\printbibliography[heading=subbibliography]
\section{Show Again}
\newrefsegment
This section will show a list of cited articles in different order \therefsection \cite{key4,key3,key2}
\subsection{References in order 2}
\printbibliography[heading=none,section=1, title={References}]
\end{document}
The output of the file after compiling it is not the desired output.
If I change the backend to biber as suggested on similar questions doesn't work it gets even worse not a single citing label is recognized.
The desired output should be like this (I create this by hand )
According to my log file, after line 39 where I declare a new refsegment all citation keys after that line become undefined. Thus, line 40 \printbibliograph produces an empty bibliography.
Is there a workaround this? I am working on Win TeXstudio 2.10.4 and on Mac TeXshop 3.61 (doesn't make any difference)




biblatexhad a bug there. But if you have to add a\newrefsectionat that point, the citations following it are independent from the\printbibliographyin the previous section. So you cannot really expect usable output. I strongly suggest you update your system. I just double checked: With a current version ofbiblatexyou get the intended output. – moewe Jul 04 '23 at 05:07