I want to place text under an entire multivariate expression, exactly the way one is able with \underbrace, but without the brace. I want it to specifically describe the first variable in the expression, but for the text to span the entire expression. I have scoured the webs and it's all about placing text under single symbols or commands. For example, \underset, \smashoperator, and \limits can't seem to function with more than one command or variable, even when I use brackets around the command line.
I got what I wanted using this:
\begin{align*}
N_{e}(r)\, =\, \sum_{u, v, w}\; &n_{e}\,(\overrightharp{\text{r}}\, -\, u\overrightharp{\text{a}}\, -\, v\overrightharp{\text{b}}\, -\, w\overrightharp{\text{c}}) \\[-.4cm]
& \lcurvearrownw \text{\footnotesize{electron density per}}\\[-.2cm]
&\; \; \; \; \; \; \; \text{\footnotesize{primitive unit cell.}}
\end{align*}
but I was wondering if there was a less hacky way of going about it. I want my client to be able to feasibly edit their documents when I am finished. In other words, I want them to know what is going on here.

It is always best to compose a fully compilable MWE that illustrates the problem including the
– Peter Grill Sep 03 '12 at 05:25\documentclassand the appropriate packages so that those trying to help don't have to recreate it.\tikzmark: You could use something like Asymmetric overbrace and usedraw=noneso that that brace is not drawn, or if you want something more elaborate Curly brace to insert something into an equation? Like an inverted underbrace. – Peter Grill Sep 03 '12 at 05:27