I was thinking about doing something crazy, namely, I want to define a "newcommand" by
\renewcommand{\alpha}{\ensuremath{\alpha}}
so that later in text mode I can just do \alpha instead of $\alpha$ (The actual macro will have \xspace in it, but let's ignore that.).
The question is, how do I let the system know, when it replace \alpha by \ensuremath{\alpha} to use the "built-in" macro \alpha, instead of the renewed one, and thus not stuck in an infinite loop?
Or, is there a way to make sure the macro only "expand" once?
\alpha-\betais different from what you'd expected. There's no reason why math symbold should be used in text without proper markup. – egreg Feb 20 '13 at 07:36\alpha-male or\epsilon-neighborhood,\delta-ball etc. And there is no easy solution for that. – h__ Feb 20 '13 at 08:13\epsilon-neighborhood, you really should write it with dollars : see for example the difference between$\epsilon$'-neighborhood(expansion of your macro) and$\epsilon'$-neighborhood(what you probably want to write). The point is : if it is always the same math symbol with the same text, you can encapsulate all in a macro. But if it may vary, you should stick with math markup. You can also see http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/34830/when-not-to-use-ensuremath-for-math-macro. – T. Verron Feb 20 '13 at 08:21$\alpha$-male. But, since it's a technical term in a non mathematical field, probably\alphamalewith a proper definition would be preferable. – egreg Feb 20 '13 at 08:46